Targeting PSMA: DNA-encoded monoclonal antibody technology. Immunotherapy, 2017

FYI: A study led by scientists at The Wistar Institute describes a novel immunotherapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer based on the use of synthetic DNA to directly encode protective antibodies targeting a cancer specific protein. This is the first application of the new technology, called DNA-encoded monoclonal antibody (DMAb), for cancer immunotherapy. The study was published online in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

Traditional treatments are invasive and can impair the quality of life of patients, underscoring the need for alternative therapeutic strategies, including immunotherapy. One of the immunotherapeutic approaches that has been explored thus far relies on the use of monoclonal antibodies that specifically target a protein present on the surface of prostate cancer cells called prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) to elicit an anti-tumor immune response and control the cancer. Although promising, this strategy is limited by the production cost required to make these therapeutic antibodies. Additionally, multiple infusions are often required to achieve efficacy.

Wistar researchers devised a novel DNA-based approach in which an engineered DNA plasmid is constructed and used to deliver the instructions to make the desired anti-PSMA antibody so that the therapy can be generated in the patient's body in a sustained manner. This research has important implications for the use of DNA-encoded monoclonal antibody technology as a platform for delivering the next generation of immunotherapies for cancer and many human diseases.

"This is an important demonstration of the possibilities opened up for immunotherapy by DMAb technology to direct in vivo production of antibodies of major relevance to human cancer," said David B. Weiner, Ph.D., executive vice president of The Wistar Institute, director of The Wistar Institute Vaccine & Immunotherapy Center, W.W. Smith Charitable Trust Professor in Cancer Research, and senior author of the study. "There is a great need for such new approaches for prostate disease as well as many other cancers. As recent data suggest, PSMA is an important cancer antigen expressed on many human prostate, bladder, renal as well as ovarian cancers, so additional study of the possible benefits of this therapy are important."

The new technology was tested in mice for the ability to generate antibodies in their blood stream that would target human PSMA as well as target PSMA-positive tumors. Results showed that antibodies were able to bind to the cancer cells and recruited specific immune cells called natural killer cells, resulting in shrinkage of the tumor, significantly improving survival.

"Our data provide proof of concept that DMAb engineered DNA plasmids can be successfully used to target important cancers," said Kar Muthumani, M.Sc., Ph.D., assistant professor in the Translational Tumor Immunology Program at Wistar, member of the Vaccine & Immunotherapy Center and lead author of the study. "The unique features of our synthetic DNA-based system make it a promising novel approach for cancer therapy, alone or in combination with other treatments."

Journal Reference:

Kar Muthumani, Liron Marnin, Sagar B. Kudchodkar, Alfredo Perales-Puchalt, Hyeree Choi, Sangya Agarwal, Veronica L. Scott, Emma L. Reuschel, Faraz I. Zaidi, Elizabeth K. Duperret, Megan C. Wise, Kimberly A. Kraynyak, Kenneth. E. Ugen, Niranjan Y. Sardesai, J. Joseph Kim, David B. Weiner. Novel prostate cancer immunotherapy with a DNA-encoded anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 2017; DOI: 10.1007/s00262-017-2042-7

3 Replies

oldestnewest
  • Attitude,

    Good article..but it will be written off as meaningless, by some up here, because it was first tested in mice..they prefer it be tested in human guinea pigs to see what happens, like Jeff Goldblum in The Fly.

    Gus

  • I like mice. When I was a young man I brought Benson Ginsburg down from Storrs to tell me how to build a house of mice so we could learn a little bit about genetics. Acquiring some good mouse lines was cheap back in the day. They didn’t eat much. They were very manageable. All in all much cheaper than human beings and they didn’t have the ability to give voice to their complaints. There were plenty of them and sacrificing a few spared many humans from sacrificial clinical trials. Benson is dead now but his mice live on. They’ve saved a lot of lives but I guess there are always going to be a few people that want to follow the old Mayan ways.

You may also like...