ART Systematic Review of the Decipher... - Active Surveillan...

Active Surveillance - Prostate Cancer

664 members373 posts

ART Systematic Review of the Decipher® Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer

RMontana profile image
0 Replies

Decipher genomic testing can help determine who will not benefit from ADT treatment thereby sparing them from side effects. When combined with SOC testing it increase predictive accuracy for who will have metastisis (MET) by 85-90%. Both biopsy and clinical specimens can be used. I had my Decipher done with my clinical specimen post RP; it was a whopping 0.97 out of 1.0 for risk; it should have come back 0.5 to match my Gleason of 4-3! The Decipher results helped me decide on sRT (salvage radiation) immediately and 2 years of ADT follow up. If nothing else its a good biomarker for your PCa and will help you further refine the visual GS gleason grade you received. I look at GS as the direction your PCa will take and a genomic test as the speed it will travel by.

Highlights: at each minute mark.

Min 2:50; OS Overall survival PCa

-35% died from prostate cancer in 18 years

-30% had no disease

-all high-risk cancer patients

-need for better stratification and risk prediction

Min 3:23; risk stratification

current tools are all used

PSA, Gleason score, T stage, CAPRA and Star CAP

25 to 45% error predictive value

Min 7:10; prognostic indicator.

-decipher is an independent prognostic indicator with high accuracy

Min 7:48; SOC + Biomarkers

-combining provides substantial improvement in prediction

Min 14:40; biomarker test comparison

-top three tests compared

-Decipher is the most robust

-It provides the most evidence

Min 17:25; use of grid signatures

-gene grid report is provided by decipher

-pulls in other genes

-15 to 20 additional included

-Polaris genes are provided

-Doctors should look for concordance between the grid and the decipher prediction

-Grid provides androgen response prediction and will identify patients who will benefit most from ADT

Min 19:03; Best predictive value for test

-determining if the use of hormone treatment will be effective

- sparing men the adverse impacts of ADT when it will not provide additional survival benefit

urotoday.com/video-lectures...

Written by
RMontana profile image
RMontana
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

ART NIH Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

Summary: Patients in this audience have had both radical prostatectomies (RP) and salvage radiation...
RMontana profile image

ART Long-Term Mortality Low Regardless of Treatment in Local Prostate Cancer

Amazing! The headline states that there is ‘low’ mortality regardless of treatment for local...
RMontana profile image

ART Radiation dose and ADT in localized PCa: a meta-regression of 5-year outcomes in phase III random control trials; 21,429 patients

I have had 21 months of ADT and also have decided to stop short of my suggested 24 months total...
RMontana profile image

ART AACR Journal ; Effect of Sulforaphane in Men with BCR after Radical Prostatectomy

I have posted an NIH study with similar findings and have noted that I have taken 20mg of...
RMontana profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.