Treatment of Paediatric Brain Cancer with T3? - Thyroid UK

Thyroid UK

141,244 members166,495 posts

Treatment of Paediatric Brain Cancer with T3?

jimh111 profile image
45 Replies

Report of an interesting study where T3 (liothyronine) was used to treat mice with medulloblastoma. The treatment reprogrammed the cells so they became normal rather than cancerous.

The study is described here foxchase.org/news/2023-04-1... .

The original abstract is here aacrjournals.org/cancerres/... but the plain English review is far easier to follow.

We will need to wait for a human trial to know if it will work. One difficulty I see is that the brain doesn't readily accept T3 so high than normal doses may be needed.

Written by
jimh111 profile image
jimh111
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
45 Replies
helvella profile image
helvellaAdministrator

Fascinating!

I've only read the news version - but couldn't appreciate why they chose T3 rather than T4. Does the full paper explain?

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply tohelvella

They were looking at the 'genomic' action of thyroid hormone. This is how we think of thyroid hormone action - T3 binding to receptors and triggering DNA expression. It is usual in these types of studies to use T3 to cut out all the complexity of T4 to T3 conversion etc. in theory at least T4 might also work although many severe illnesses cause 'low T3 syndrome'. I don't have knowledge of the actions of cancers on T4 to T3 conversion, it seems that different cancers can have different effects.

As an aside I love this statement: 'In the study, they treated mice that had medulloblastoma with T3, a synthetic form of the thyroid hormone triiodothyronine, which is often used to treat hypothyroidism'. If only liothyronine was often used.

By the way, this study has nothing to do with the non-genomic effects of T4 binding to cell surface receptors, a mechanism that proliferates cancers.

TSH110 profile image
TSH110 in reply tojimh111

it’s a typo, they missed out ref

ie often refused

LindaC profile image
LindaC in reply tohelvella

I thought T4, albeit necessary, is a storage hormone, unlike the active T3.

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply toLindaC

Thyroid hormone is mainly active after T4 is converted to T3. The T3 binds to receptors (and 'cofactors') onto the 'thyroid response element (TRE)' on DNA. This is called genomic action and it releases RNA which produces proteins that 'do stuff' (I express it this way because I don't understand what goes on at this stage). This is the principal way thyroid hormone works.

However, like any substance in the body T4 can have other activities. T4 also binds to receptors on the cell membrane particularly the 'intergrin αVβ3 receptor'. This is called non-genomic action and is fast acting, because there is no need for DNA expression (which takes several hours).

In simple terms thyroid hormone action is effected by T3 action on DNA but there are other minor actions that T4 (and T3) can have without binding to DNA.

LindaC profile image
LindaC in reply tojimh111

Thank you, jim - minor actions = not something I needed to go into, so thanks. T1 and T2 also dipped into.

This article is most interesting, so again, thank you.

helvella profile image
helvellaAdministrator in reply toLindaC

But...

We keep being told that T3 cannot get through the blood-brain barrier into the brain. (Untrue.)

We keep being told that T4 is all we need as the body simply converts as needed. We know how that is not the whole picture.

The brain does perform a fair amount of its own T4 to T3 conversion and appears able to manage some degree of variable T3 levels in different parts of the brain.

I'd expect a number of endocrinologists to insist there is no justification for using T3. Though Jim has replied with some good thoughts.

LindaC profile image
LindaC in reply tohelvella

We certainly do know it's not the whole picture.

I had way sufficient T4, given Levo [trialed, Dr S] to find that it led to me being 'speedy', getting up dancing/kicking my height [as I used to be! ;-) ], until I realised that feeling was 'too wired'. Finally, Dr P = T3 alone, most of the time fine for more than a decade... T4 # always very low: I must ignore that.

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply tohelvella

The brain prefers T4 using D2 to convert it to T3. This allows it to regulate local T3 levels independent of blood T3. It also means that if there is a peripheral conversion problem giving enough T3 to restore serum fT3 will not deliver adequate T3 to the brain.

asidist profile image
asidist in reply tojimh111

jim111, did you mean the brain prefers T4 using D2 to convert T4 to T3, thereby self-regulating the amount of T3 independent from serum T3 levels?

Sorry if I'm misunderstanding the point you were making - my own brain seems to be quite clogged (presumably due to low levels of both hormones) so harder to wrap my head around things these days

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply toasidist

Yes I did. I've now amended my post to correct the error.

asidist profile image
asidist in reply tojimh111

Interesting! Thank you for clarifying. Does this mean taking T3 only would put one at a disadvantage in terms of brain functioning, or alternately that hypos on T3 monotherapy may have to take higher levels than needed by the body (effectively overmedicating?) in order to get enough T3 to the brain? Or, does the brain somehow work around lack of T4 in that situation and work just fine when serum levels of T3 are adequate despite low/absent T4?

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply toasidist

I think the question is too complex for anyone to give a precise answer. The body and in particular the deiodinases adjust to hormone levels so it's likely there will be some compensation. However, my judgement going from my knowledge and personal experience is that T3 monotherapy will lead to 'asymmetric' (can't find a better term) therapy, that sone tissues will be a bit hypo and some hyper. This is why I always suggest people stay on the lowest effective dose and not aim for perfection. I take up to 50 mcg liothyronine. I also take 50 mcg levothyroxine. The levothyroxine doesn't have much effect on symptoms but it seems a good idea to haven't some in case there are effects we are not aware of.We should also bear in mind that many people are severely hypothyroid, or can't function normally without above average T3 levels. There are risks on both sides. This is why endocrinologists should get off their backsides, establish which groups need what dose and urgently identity the underlying causes. By finding treatments for the underlying causes patients can be taken off thyroid hormone or put on doses that mimic thyroidal secretion. Levothyroxine monotherapy is not a safe option.

asidist profile image
asidist in reply tojimh111

Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and insights, Jim - super interesting. Apologies for my very delayed response. I recall reading that T4 and T3 both have direct and differing impact on hair follicles ( this miggt be the article: academic.oup.com/jcem/artic... so figure it’s quite likely that T4 may have other direct impacts on the body as well as you say. And helpful to hear of your dosages - haven’t heard of those kinds of numbers too often but I seem to be headed in that direction as well and hearing this makes me feel a bit more comfortable with that.

Not sure I’m understanding what you mean by treating underlying causes (such as tackling autoimmunity and / or triggers of autoimmunity like viral infections, toxins, microbiome, etc, ?)

Couldnt agree more that we need better, more physiologically aligned treatment options and protocols. Think about that all the time.

Edit: I’m curious if you think T4 monotherapy isn’t a safe option eve n in those who covert very well?

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply toasidist

By tackling underlying causes I'm thinking of other causes of insufficient thyroid hormone action such as endocrine disruption or subnormal TSH secretion. Rather than just dosing T3 and T4 to resolve symptoms it is better to try and get rid of the root cause.I always supported levothyroxine monotherapy for those who did well on it but changed my view when I came across the cancer proliferating effects of higher fT4 levels. I now feel monotherapy should not routinely be used.

asidist profile image
asidist in reply tojimh111

Unfortunately here in the U.S. where corporate money pretty much runs the show we’re a very long ways from where we need to be in terms of even acknowledging the harm caused by so many of the toxins including the many endocrine disrupters we’re now perpetually exposed to, let alone properly regulating them or providing legitimized medical assistance to evaluate or treat the effects. At least the UK does better in terms of regulations than we do. Hopefully there’ll be a radical shift in thinking about these things some time in the foreseeable future.

I saw you’d mentioned t4 playing a role in proliferating cancer above as well, don’t think I’d ever heard that before so this is new to me, will look into it more. Thank you.

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply toasidist

The UK, EU and USA banned PBDEs (and PCBs earlier) around 2004 but sadly they hang around for a very long time.

I discuss T4 and cancer here ibshypo.com/index.php/thyro... . Please note I am not a doctor nor do I have knowledge of cancer.

asidist profile image
asidist in reply tojimh111

Thank you for the link and for putting together the information! Read through a couple pages, look forward to the rest.

In addition to PBDEs and PCBs we're also chronically exposed to pthalates, BPA and BPS (which has been found in the coating of thermal receipt paper at up to 1000 times the level found in cans!), pesticides, PFAS, parabens, etc - not sure to what what degree those effect thyroid hormones in particular, but broadly speaking endocrine disruptors are ubiquitous!

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply toasidist

Very much so. The difficult bit is identifying which one(s) is causing the problem. I take the approach that it's unlikely to be ones with short half-lives because they won't accumulate much and more importantly we would notice their effect. For example, if we only had symptoms at home or when having drinks from plastic bottles we would spot the connection. So, I think most problems involve EDCs with long half-lives. At least this narrows it down a bit.Endocrinologists completely ignore endocrine disruption, probably because they would have to think and carry out a proper examination of the patient.

asidist profile image
asidist in reply tojimh111

Ha, no that won't be happening in any endo's office anytime soon.

PFAS are definitely among the most concerning EDCs for the reason you state - and they are EVERYWHERE, at least in the U.S. - including in our drinking water. Now thankfully there are filters available for PFAS but they're expensive and variably effective.

I actually tend to think about EDCs rather differently, even short-lived ones - seems to me that they are SO ubiquitous (if ubiquitousness can have levels) that trying to isolate the effects of a particular exposure would be nearly impossible (though admittedly with limited hypo mental capacity, a lot feels impossible to me) - for instance, repeatedly walking barefoot on vinyl flooring that may be in one's home, the perpetual contact with plastic cases on phones, handling receipts when we go shopping, the various personal care products we put on our bodies daily (especially in the case of women, who tend to use many more products than men), the water we drink, the electronics we're constantly handling, the absorption into food from various food packaging as well as contaminants in food (like microplastics in seafood), medical implants, etc. And a lot of that is unknown and undisclosed exposure (e.g., manufacturers who claim BPA-free cans sometimes just replace BPA with BPS).

I try to avoid exposures as much as possible but even with being vigilant seems to me a reduced exposure is the best we can hope for in this day and age. I'm actually less careful now than I used to be because I realize how futile the efforts are.

(This comment is a ray of sunshine, huh? 🙃)

asidist profile image
asidist in reply tojimh111

Was thinking about this again and wondering if things might be different in the UK and EU which tend to have tighter regulations than the US so looked it up and came across this - thought you may be interested if you haven’t seen it already

Revealed: scale of ‘forever chemical’ pollution across UK and Europe

theguardian.com/environment....

TSH110 profile image
TSH110

this makes me wonder if low T3 might allow cancers to proliferate in the first place. Hope not I had a lot of years of low T3

greygoose profile image
greygoose in reply toTSH110

I often wonder that.

TSH110 profile image
TSH110 in reply togreygoose

It can’t help I’m sure, it causes so many problems. It’s fundamental to good health and well-being. I wish endocrinology would wake up to this fact and stop starving us of it. I’m beginning to think other areas of medicine will be the ones to move things forward whilst endocrinology lazily slumbers on in undeserved contentment oblivious to what everyone else is discovering about T3. They would, of course, when they think TSH is the only thing that matters….a false idol if there ever was one.

greygoose profile image
greygoose in reply toTSH110

Totally agree. But, as has been said before, they would then have to admit that they'd been wrong for years, and doctors aren't very good at that!

Alanna012 profile image
Alanna012 in reply togreygoose

Oh no, they definitely are not.

Alanna012 profile image
Alanna012 in reply toTSH110

Well anecdotally, I for one feel that some of the physical effects of being T3 deprived for so long are permanent. I don't read or write as well as I used to, for just one thing. I've been told off today for missing things at my volunteering job. It's cognitive. I hope cancer isn't also one of those things T3 deprivation predisposes me to.

arTistapple profile image
arTistapple in reply toAlanna012

Unfortunately there is at least anecdotal info on this. However there are a number of posts on here that tell us that improvement (on optimal dose) goes on for months, even years. I am holding on to those ones.

Alanna012 profile image
Alanna012 in reply toarTistapple

Yes I shall hold on to them too!

Imaaan profile image
Imaaan in reply toAlanna012

If only you saw yourself through my lens. You express yourself exceptionally well despite your t3 deprivation❤️

Alanna012 profile image
Alanna012 in reply toImaaan

Ahhh🤗. Thank you!!♥️

TSH110 profile image
TSH110 in reply toAlanna012

My reading and writing have been badly affected too and my once meticulous attention to detail can be deeply suspect. Ask for a reasonable adjustment at the volunteering job as they should be enabling you to work with this horrible illness not not telling you off like a naughty child for something that’s happened as a result of the disorder. It’s a poor show treating a volunteer like that.

Alanna012 profile image
Alanna012 in reply toTSH110

Thank you I appreciate the encouragement!

The person I report to has tried to be understanding and there's a lot I don't do, as the main problem is my concentration is poor (sometimes I keep falling into daydreaming) and I can literally have a sort of cognitive blindness, where I don't see things that need to be done.

In this situation what happened was for various reasons I can't disclose, I had a sudden interruption of my meds, and whilst I communicated this to the manager (with whom I have done many lengthy explanations of the impact of having the right meds, vs. not having them) she still doesn't quite get it. She is good, caring and I likely wouldn't receive the same support in a paying job. The thing is only someone whose been there can understand fully. I can't blame anyone for not getting it at all.

And then I feel like a moaner for having to keep explaining and so sometimes just accept the tongue lashing for 'not concentrating on tasks better' it's a small organisation and a mistake can be a big problem.

TSH110 profile image
TSH110 in reply toAlanna012

It’s not moaning, it’s explaining and educating your boss and trying to get her support to do the job well. They should be doing it by law it’s not a kind favour they are deigning to give you out of the charity of their hearts, but a right they need to put in place not to be breaking equalities law. As for being reprimanded, I find that awful management on the part of your boss. No one should be tongue lashed at work - she needs some management training! I bet others don’t like being treated like that either well no one does, surely.? You’d concentrate on it if you could but her expectations are not realistic. I’d be looking at how I could make it work for you not absolving my responsibility by blaming you, even more so if a mistake can have large implications.

Alanna012 profile image
Alanna012 in reply toTSH110

Thank you so much for your encouragement and support♥️xx

TSH110 profile image
TSH110 in reply toAlanna012

Well I hope you can get more support I know how awful it is trying to work when you have this disorder. I became utterly incompetent and was working when my hypothyroidism was very overt and I was still useless after two years of Levothyroxine. NDT was my saviour I retrained in gardening and have never looked back. It’s a more forgiving vocation and I got a sole gardener job so I am my own boss more or less. I had to work hard to get there doing exams and training and the like but it paid off. Not sure I’d have managed to on T4 monotherapy though. You keep soldiering on. This disorder affords us great insight, like you say it’s hard to know it unless you have had it. It allows you to empathise with and help others when things have gone decidely pear shaped in your own life. It’s the one good thing that comes out of it - greater compassion for human suffering.

Alanna012 profile image
Alanna012 in reply toTSH110

Yes, it certainly has given me greater compassion for human suffering, that I can say!

I can also relate so much to what you're saying regarding diminishing competency when ill with this disease. It has been an awful confidence sapping experience. I do think perhaps this post isn't a good fit as truthfully, it needs a lot of attention to detail.

Your work sounds ideal, I am trying to think of things I can do on my own, at a pace that works for me. I really want to get well enough to do that. Unfortunately jumping through certain hoops recently has put me back a fair bit.

I really appreciate your posts, they've really helped me feel better about it all♥️

jgelliss profile image
jgelliss

Wow!!! This can be a tremendous breakthrough. Because the heart the brain muscles have a big receptive sights for T3. Thank you so much for sharing such a valuable information. Lets hope it works even better on humans. After all T3 is proving to have a very valuable place in our well-being. 🙏 . Now let's hope that Dr's except it too.

LindaC profile image
LindaC in reply tojgelliss

For some, seems hell will freeze over first! We can but hope! x

jgelliss profile image
jgelliss in reply toLindaC

Your right. But hopefully as you said and positivity may get us somewhere. 🙏

Imaaan profile image
Imaaan

Thnxs for sharing. I pray that a day comes where T3/NDT becomes mainstream and is readily accessible for those that truly need it.

Zephyrbear profile image
Zephyrbear

If their own thyroids were still producing T3, then surely any supplementation would become ‘higher than normal doses’? I have followed some of these kiddies on social media and contributed to their various fundraisers for treatments and it’s heartbreaking to watch them fight so hard and still end up losing. I’m sure the parents would want to try any treatment that might just save their child when ‘thoughts and prayers’ have run out.

jimh111 profile image
jimh111 in reply toZephyrbear

It sounds promising but we must wait for human trials before we know.

I should have mentioned it earlier but this study shows benefits of T3 for one specific cancer. We can't assume it would be effective for other cancers

helvella profile image
helvellaAdministrator in reply tojimh111

Jim,

I think that is quite clear from your subject, your post and if you follow the link!

TSH110 profile image
TSH110 in reply toZephyrbear

The STAR study on people with fast cycling bipolar were given T3, I think at quite high doses, but it did not cause elevated levels and it did alleviate symptoms in a high number of subjects. It is a highly intractable condition with a very poor treatment response so this was an interesting result.

It may be the same if it were given for brain cancer in children and anything that could assist there would be hugely welcome.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Endocrine Disruptors PBDEs Reduce T4 to T3 Conversion in the Brain

This study https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00072 shows that PBDE flame retardants...
jimh111 profile image

Size of Thyroid and T3 Levels

Thyroid UK advisors have published papers showing that patients without a thyroid have lower T3...
jimh111 profile image

Exogenous T3 administration provides neuroprotection in a murine model of traumatic brain injury

It feels as if I have posted more abstracts about uses of T3 other than for treating...
helvella profile image
Administrator

Interesting study on T3 and vasodilation

This is a complex study of the effect of T3 on vasodilation...
jimh111 profile image

T4 'intolerance' and T3 treatment

Apologies for the long post and apologies for any inaccuracies - I'm an engineer not an...
loueldhen profile image