A friend has just contacted me to say she’s been prescribed 10 sessions of Tai Chi paid for by the NHS. WTF? That’s Tai Chi, not T3. She’s had sciatica and I love her dearly and don’t want to see her in any pain, but even she was laughing. Especially as she could easily afford to pay for the sessions herself. I’m sure Tai Chi is very nice and may help some - but the NHS website says this...
‘While there's scope for more rigorous research on tai chi's health benefits, studies have shown that it can help people aged 65 and over to reduce stress, improve posture, balance and general mobility, and increase muscle strength in the legs.
Can tai chi help to prevent falls?
Some research suggests tai chi can reduce the risk of falls among older adults who are at increased risk. However, more research is needed.’
More research needed eh? The modal verb ‘can’ makes more than one appearance - maybe, perhaps, might help then? Seems to me they are talking out of both sides of their mouth when it comes to T3 and it’s ‘possible’ benefits. I can only conclude Tai Chi must be cheaper...
I’m not suggesting Tai Chi shouldn’t be prescribed if it may help someone feel well, I don’t want anyone suffering, (though it may be questioned in a time of cutbacks), just that the double-standard in comparison to T3, the studies and benefits, screamed at me!