Hi
I would like to share the experience I had with my new GP yesterday regarding requesting a PSA three months within my last test.
I requested the testing because my last PSA had slightly elevated to 6.6, my latest MRI has reported the finding of a new area in the mid zone of my prostate as a PIRADS 4 to accompany my existing PIRADS 4 diagnosed in 2019. I am awaiting a second biopsy within the public system of South Australia.
I have recently moved to rural SA from Tasmania where I was under the guidance/care of a urologist. Who diligently performed Active Surveillance protocol for my diagnosis of a Gleason 6 adenocarcinoma.
Anyway you would have thought by this GP response to my request that I was asking him for half of his weekly earnings. He wanted first for me to answer what difference it would make to my current treatment outcome, why would I be wanting to be tested for a PSA test three months from the previous testing and what was I expecting to gain from knowing the results as I was awaiting a second biopsy anyway.
Do other people on this forum feel that my request was unreasonable, I am under the opinion that changes indicate a three monthly PSA check under active Surveillance. Six monthly if all is good. Am I wrong in this assumption.
The outcome was he gave me the referral for the PSA test reluctantly. He stated to not ask again for at least 6 months, which I advised him I wouldn’t if it remains the same or lower. He asked me what will I want if it’s elevated more so, I said a PSMA pet scan if it ever reaches 10 or higher, hopefully not.
I left his office feeling anxious, humiliated and not advised. Has anyone else had this problem with monitoring? I thought Active Surveillance was meant to be Active. I will not be returning to this practice
My urologist here is in Adelaide 2.5 or so hours away, he will be performing the second biopsy on the 7 March. Do I just forget about PSA testing?
Thanks if anyone has any guidance or anything to offer as insight.
Ian