mr. Smith: just got diagnosed with... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,081 members3,183 posts

mr. Smith

Laguy01 profile image
6 Replies

just got diagnosed with prostate cancer with gleson scale of 8. I have had CAT scan and bone scan, they came back good. My urologist is suggesting surgery or possibly surgery, radiation and hormone therapy. The radiologist says proton or IMTR radiation plus hormone treatment. I have appointment to talk to surgeon tomorrow. I am trying to decide on what option is best. I am going to talk to a surgeon tomorrow about doing a MRI and PSMA scan. Anybody got experiences or info on this.

Written by
Laguy01 profile image
Laguy01
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

You have time. Talk to several radiation oncologists and urologists.

prostatecancer.news/2016/08...

Laguy01 profile image
Laguy01 in reply to Tall_Allen

i have spoken to multiple Doctors, urologist, radiologist, and talk to the surgeon tomorrow. My concerns are erecting issues and inconsonance. I am 58 years old and fairly good shape. I do worry about the inconsonance more. I am trying to figure out what has better odds for not having to deal with inconsonance, radiation or surgery.

Xavier10 profile image
Xavier10

These days radiation is so precise there is a lot of movement towards it. the good thing about surgery is they can analyze the tissue they remove more precisely. But it doesn't change the outcome. And PSA levels have traditionally been excellent markers.

Tall_Allen has a good repository of info on the comparison. You can browse the different articles. Here's just one example of a comparison between radiation and surgery from 2016 and if anything radiation just gets better every year:

prostatecancer.news/search/...

You can read a proton radiation cancer doctor's substack and see how he approaches high risk (which I think Gleason 8 is just getting into high risk) and the success rates:

protons101.substack.com/p/h...

Some would suggest a Pylarify or PSMA scan. Basically the same thing and can tell you better than a CAT scan or bone scan whether there is any spread to pelvic area, which you would want to know, while it is still curable. We are just now in the phase where these scans are often given up front to let us know whether pelvic radiation should be used or is unnecessary. Some Doctors feel comfortable relying on traditional scans - MRIs and CT scans. If it was me, I would want the new PSMA scan. or Pylarify either one.

Laguy01 profile image
Laguy01 in reply to Xavier10

thank you for your reply. I go tomorrow for consult with surgeon. I had a consult with radiologist yesterday. I am going to request A PSMA scan and MRI tomorrow. I am leaning toward radiation and hormone treatment. Big Decision to make.

NanoMRI profile image
NanoMRI

I was diagnosed at 57, nearly ten years ago. Based on my experiences with multiple treatments, use all available investigative methods before treatment decision.

Multi-parametric MRI was crucial to my treatment decision/selection and I would not accept any treatment suggestions from a doctor that has Not reviewed (and understands) the mpMRI findings. Genomic testing of biopsy tissue was very useful, I had the Oncotype DX test from Genomic Health; today you have additional options. I found second opinions of mpMRI findings and biopsy pathology crucial as well.

Neither PSMA imaging nor liquid blood biopsy were available at the time of my diagnosis - today I would push (may have to push hard) for both. I would hold off on additional treatment consultations until I had all investigative results.

Since my diagnosis I have strived to, if it comes to it, defer ADT and likely CR for as long as possible. Based on mpMRI findings surgery was my best choice.

Being young and otherwise healthy and fit, and with no cancer in critical urinary bits, my post RP continence was excellent and remains so. And my sexual function post RP recovery was more than adequate. RP also offers earliest and best PSA testing means for remaining cancer.

I did have to have salvage RT and that left me with several side-effects and it did not get all the cancer either; mine had spread further than we had hoped.

Hope this helps. All the best!

Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_

NanoMRI's experience and advice should be taken very seriously. Only thing I can add is to not buy into any "cure" promises. There isn't any "cure", only shorter or longer remissions. You are relatively young for PCa and you will have to hedge treatments for the rest of your life.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Prostate Cancer PSA is detectible again

I am a 57-year-old male. My prostate cancer was diagnosed in 2019, and I had a radical...

PSA continues rise...PSMA remains good

To briefly review, now 69 years old, had RP at Hopkins in Feb 2018. Gleason 4+5. Margins clear....

After Orgovyx

Age 76, diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer in December 2021. PSA was 8.6, but had zero...

My prostate journey and testosterone side effects

I have been following this website for over a year now and have learned so much from others who...

Ultrahypofractional RT and ADT for Int. Risk PC

I am a 60 year old recently diagnosed PC with a PSA of 11.3 and ultra sound biopsy grade cT1c...