just got diagnosed with prostate cancer with gleson scale of 8. I have had CAT scan and bone scan, they came back good. My urologist is suggesting surgery or possibly surgery, radiation and hormone therapy. The radiologist says proton or IMTR radiation plus hormone treatment. I have appointment to talk to surgeon tomorrow. I am trying to decide on what option is best. I am going to talk to a surgeon tomorrow about doing a MRI and PSMA scan. Anybody got experiences or info on this.
mr. Smith: just got diagnosed with... - Prostate Cancer N...
mr. Smith
![Laguy01 profile image](https://images.hu-production.be/avatars/990870a70cbd4fcc854f6ab975386747_small@2x_100x100.jpg)
![Laguy01 profile image](https://images.hu-production.be/avatars/990870a70cbd4fcc854f6ab975386747_small@2x_100x100.jpg)
You have time. Talk to several radiation oncologists and urologists.
prostatecancer.news/2016/08...
i have spoken to multiple Doctors, urologist, radiologist, and talk to the surgeon tomorrow. My concerns are erecting issues and inconsonance. I am 58 years old and fairly good shape. I do worry about the inconsonance more. I am trying to figure out what has better odds for not having to deal with inconsonance, radiation or surgery.
These days radiation is so precise there is a lot of movement towards it. the good thing about surgery is they can analyze the tissue they remove more precisely. But it doesn't change the outcome. And PSA levels have traditionally been excellent markers.
Tall_Allen has a good repository of info on the comparison. You can browse the different articles. Here's just one example of a comparison between radiation and surgery from 2016 and if anything radiation just gets better every year:
prostatecancer.news/search/...
You can read a proton radiation cancer doctor's substack and see how he approaches high risk (which I think Gleason 8 is just getting into high risk) and the success rates:
protons101.substack.com/p/h...
Some would suggest a Pylarify or PSMA scan. Basically the same thing and can tell you better than a CAT scan or bone scan whether there is any spread to pelvic area, which you would want to know, while it is still curable. We are just now in the phase where these scans are often given up front to let us know whether pelvic radiation should be used or is unnecessary. Some Doctors feel comfortable relying on traditional scans - MRIs and CT scans. If it was me, I would want the new PSMA scan. or Pylarify either one.
I was diagnosed at 57, nearly ten years ago. Based on my experiences with multiple treatments, use all available investigative methods before treatment decision.
Multi-parametric MRI was crucial to my treatment decision/selection and I would not accept any treatment suggestions from a doctor that has Not reviewed (and understands) the mpMRI findings. Genomic testing of biopsy tissue was very useful, I had the Oncotype DX test from Genomic Health; today you have additional options. I found second opinions of mpMRI findings and biopsy pathology crucial as well.
Neither PSMA imaging nor liquid blood biopsy were available at the time of my diagnosis - today I would push (may have to push hard) for both. I would hold off on additional treatment consultations until I had all investigative results.
Since my diagnosis I have strived to, if it comes to it, defer ADT and likely CR for as long as possible. Based on mpMRI findings surgery was my best choice.
Being young and otherwise healthy and fit, and with no cancer in critical urinary bits, my post RP continence was excellent and remains so. And my sexual function post RP recovery was more than adequate. RP also offers earliest and best PSA testing means for remaining cancer.
I did have to have salvage RT and that left me with several side-effects and it did not get all the cancer either; mine had spread further than we had hoped.
Hope this helps. All the best!