Thoughts on Treatment Options and Sec... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,258 members3,324 posts

Thoughts on Treatment Options and Second Opinions

rlafford profile image
4 Replies

Story so far: 3T Multiphase MRI found a 1.4cm lesion in the right mid anterior transition zone, corresponding to: PI-RADS assessment category 4. So my urologist performed a MRI Ultrasound Fusion 14 core biopsy. 4 cores were through the lesion. Results: 3 cores graded "- Prostate tissue with a small focus of atypical glands, suspicious for carcinoma.

- Separate high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia."

One core - Prostatic adenocarcinoma, conventional/acinar type, involving two (2) of fragmented cores (see Comment). - Gleason score: 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade Group 1).

- Tumor quantitation: Two (2) small foci, 5% of the total specimen.

Lesion #1 (right mid anterior transition zone) - Prostatic adenocarcinoma, conventional/acinar type, involving four (4) of four (4) cores (see Comment). - Gleason score: 3 + 4 = 7 (Grade Group 2; less than 5% Gleason pattern 4).

- Tumor quantitation: 30% of the total specimen.

Comment: The Gleason pattern 4 in this case lacks cribriform morphology. Case has received departmental consultation on 06/30/2022

My uro is setting up appointments for both surgical and radiological consults.

Should I ask that samples be sent for a second opinion ie. Epstein at Johns Hopkins?

Thoughts on treatment options based on biopsy findings? My uro seems to lean towards removal but I'm fearful of the unintended consequences.

Written by
rlafford profile image
rlafford
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
4 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

You can never go wrong with a second opinion from Epstein.

You appear to be a good candidate for active surveillance. Suggest you talk to an AS specialist.

rlafford profile image
rlafford in reply toTall_Allen

Thanks for the reply. I will definitely do this.

CarverD profile image
CarverD

2nd opninion from Epstein at Johns Hopkins is a very good plan.

Less than 5% pattern 4 is a strong indicator that active surveillance is warranted.

If you "just can't live with that" you should research focal therapies before opting for surgery or radiation treatments. Sounds like your uro works with a surgeon and will always recommend removal regardless of the possible side effects. My uro did the same; with 20% pattern 4 I opted for HDRBrachytherapy and couldn't be happier with the results.

rlafford profile image
rlafford in reply toCarverD

Much appreciate your thoughts and experience.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Uro and Surgeon Recommending Focal Cryoablation

After confirming my pc diagnosis via biopsy was accurate, I have been looking at various...
rlafford profile image

2nd Opinion downgraded 4+3 60%4’s to 3+4 30% 4’s from MD Anderson. Thoughts?

PSA 18.987 MRI: 32ml 4.5x3.6x3.7 9mm lesion, prostatitis of peripheral gland, BPH of Central...
bl2307 profile image

Treatment Options

PSA 4.7 (over 2 years it double and then doubled again) This is the Pathology report A:...
Vortex12 profile image

Diagnosed 4+3

Hello all, Yesterday I was diagnosed with prostate cancer & would appreciate any guidance....
bl2307 profile image

Here we go.......

FULL DISCLOSURE, LONG POST Had a TRUS biopsy end of September after AS of a rising PSA. Had a...

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.