Here's an interesting article that challenges the assumption that nutritional value is lost in cooking. In fact, cooking can make more of the nutrients available for the body to take up..... Fascinating stuff.
Is raw food necessarily better than cooked? - PMRGCAuk
Is raw food necessarily better than cooked?
Hi,
Very interesting.
Where do some if these 'experts' get their ideas from! As for us having a shorter lifespan and more diseases than the caveman - well really.
We've probably got more diseases because of the airplane not the cooking pot.
I love salads, fresh fruit and sushi come to that, but don't think I could live without a nice piece of roast chicken or the occasional fish and chips!
A dinosaur burger anyone?
For me the thing about cooking breaking down cell walls so that you can get at the good stuff really made sense.
Yes - my answer was a bit flippant but that's me when some of these people come out with their odd ideas.
But I quite agree we probably ate lots of thing raw originally and then tried cooking them and decided it tasted better.
Personally, this article came at a good time for me. I’ve had a mild form of IBS with diarrhea for decades. I’ve always eaten a diet including a fair about of fiber, including whole grain foods, raw fruit and vegetables. While I cooked veggies, I enjoyed them al dente. And, I thought the fiber would help as a binding agent.
A few weeks ago, I decided to look up the benefits of a low fiber diet for my situation. Low and behold, it can be helpful. Although I really didn’t like the idea of dropping certain fruits from my diet, and cooking veggies longer. I decided to give it a try. Things are improving.
I know you can find arguments pro and con for any topic. For now, I find this article very reassuring,
Thanks for sharing.