Is there any difference in efficacy between getting a b12 shot in muscle vs in fat? I got my bi-daily methly b12 shot today and I had a new nurse and she suggested a shot in the hip/glute rather than the arm. I have always had it in the arm but went along with the hip suggestion. Now my leg muscles are pretty wasted including my hip/glute which leaves that area mostly fat. Not sure she got into the muscle. Does it make a real difference? I've read that it doesnt.
With love.
Written by
lownskater52
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
I tried my first self-injection last month into sub cutaneous fat and it seemed to work. I still got a rash of small spots on my face for a few days after which is what I got with NHS-administered intramuscualr injections too so I guess it worked?
If the B12 gets into your body then it has to get into the bloodstream before it can get out again. That means that any type of injection will deliver 100% of the dose into the blood. The only difference would be the speed at which it gets into the blood.
Nobody knows which would be fastest, IM or SC. Many assume IM, only because it is more highly perfused with blood. But some drugs (not just fat soluble ones) move into the blood more rapidly from SC than IM. Until somebody does the test there's no real way of knowing.
I’m of the opinion that I want the B12 to get into the blood as “slow as possible”. If I wanted to get it into the blood stream as fast as possible, I could inject intravenous (IV).
However, then the kidneys would clean it out and it would all go straight down the drain.
I inject IM because it seems slower and lasts longer. I avoid sleeping on the most recent injection site to keep from pushing the B12 out of the muscle.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.