eGFR - different calculations, different re... - Kidney Disease

Kidney Disease

12,867 members5,237 posts

eGFR - different calculations, different results

Transalp profile image
6 Replies

I'm sure the old lags here know all about this and doubtless there is data about it kicking around, but it might help some newbies wondering about their variable eGFR results.

The eGFR is predominantly calculated from your blood creatinine, age, sex etc using an equation, but the equation has changed over the years, which gives slightly different results.

We have:

MDRD equation from 1999

CKD-EPI equation from 2009

CKD-EPI equation from 2021

The reason I bring it up is my NHS lab results of today - they are still using the 2009 calculation (per NICE guidelines as apparently Brits are different than Americans), which doesn't compare directly to recent private tests who were using the newer 2021 calculation.

My result today is an eGFR (2009) of 75, however if they had used the older MDRD equation it would have been 70, or if they had used the newer 2021 equation it would have been 80. Quite a spread.

There is also the CKD-EPI 2021 equation that uses Cystatin-C as well as creatinine, which some think of as more accurate or giving earlier detection - a previous result of mine using the 2021 equation and creatinine-only was eGFR 78, but when the cystatin-C number was added to the equation it came back as eGFR 55. Ouch.

Just for people to be aware when comparing results and trends over the last few years, you really need to try and ensure they are all using the same equation - you can plug your creatinine numbers into these links to check.

mdcalc.com/calc/3939/ckd-ep...

mdcalc.com/calc/76/mdrd-gfr...

Written by
Transalp profile image
Transalp
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
6 Replies
orangecity41 profile image
orangecity41NKF Ambassador

Thanks for pointing this out. You may not be told of this calculation change by your Doctor

Momwatcher profile image
Momwatcher

seems to me this is a HUGE detail not to be missed or ignored!!!

Pugsdad profile image
Pugsdad

thank you! I’m going to check them out.

jflorax profile image
jflorax

I'm from Canada, to be honest I don't quite understand the calculations rattling about either.

Nephrodoc profile image
Nephrodoc

Your results are a great example of how inaccurate these formulas are for any given patient.

So none of the formulas are better for any individual. In these ranges of eGFR you may not have CKD if you have no albuminuria

Transalp profile image
Transalp in reply toNephrodoc

Well my ACR is 2.5 (US units) (0.3 UK units), so that's not bad. That said I have had several lab results with eGFR in the 50's and early 60's.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Why are eGFR calculations different?

Hello Everyone, So I'm wondering if anyone can shred some light on this question. When my labs are...
Sarah_402 profile image

A Simple explanation of the inaccuracies of eGFR

Please note I don’t condone what they are preaching just hope this better explains why, as so many...

Normal range for egfr

What is the normal range for a woman who is 56 years old?The result is here : is it normal? eGFR...
lbadbunnyy profile image

High Potassium Level

I am 28 year old male and having issue with heart palpitation only after eating. Doctor did some...
ShaneWarne profile image

some basic information on CKD

I am a nephrologist and have some things to share which may help: 1) A eGFR is a number calculated...
Nephrodoc profile image

Moderation team

See all
PattyM_NKF profile image
PattyM_NKFModerator
DorisL_NKF profile image
DorisL_NKFModerator

Top community tags

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.