Diagnostic Criteria (WHO) for MF, PV and ET - MPN Voice

MPN Voice

10,445 members14,398 posts

Diagnostic Criteria (WHO) for MF, PV and ET

Paul123456 profile image
11 Replies

Possibly of interest to some.

mpnconnect.com/pdf/who-diag...

Written by
Paul123456 profile image
Paul123456
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
11 Replies
mammared profile image
mammared

Thanks Paul, and the beat goes on. I guess that we shall have updates (2008, 2016) as the research continues. It is an ever changing world, this one called MPNs. I hope that the next update is sooner than 8 years!

B

ChrisAnnSen profile image
ChrisAnnSen

Hmmm - well I looked at your link and could understand every alternate word. I guess I'll leave the technical stuff to my Haem. But thanks for sharing.

S031251 profile image
S031251 in reply to ChrisAnnSen

I’m with you!

WileyFrench profile image
WileyFrench

I think I need a bit of a translation too!😉

Rachelthepotter profile image
Rachelthepotter

Thanks, Paul. Could be handy to show to haems who are not MPN specialists.

Wentry profile image
Wentry

Hi Paul, This doesn't mention a diagnosis of pre-fibrotic MF separate to ET but the WHO does, is this not up to date?

Paul123456 profile image
Paul123456 in reply to Wentry

Thanks, good question. I note it’s dated 2016 at the bottom so may have been superceeded. Will check it out.

However would have thought web site link would have updated.......

Wentry profile image
Wentry in reply to Paul123456

I have read at least one article that said the British Classifications for MPN diagnoses do not include the Prefibrotic MF category separate to ET, which is at variance with the WHO MPN diagnosis categories, maybe that's why it isn't included? It is hard to distinguish even with bone marrow morphology according to my haem here in NZ, however my BMB has not shown any of the things associated with Prefibrotic MF so I'm happy with that. I think there has been at least one research that looked at groups of MPN patients diagnosed and classified using the British Classifications, they then re-classified them using the 2016 WHO rules and a fair number of the ET patients (I can't remember the % off the top of my head but it wasn't a small number) were re-classified as Prefibrotic MF. They said this was important as the diagnosis of Prefibrotic MF definitely has a poorer long term prognosis compared to ET, and would probably change the treatment plan for the patient, and not leave it to watch and wait for so long.

Wendy

Paul123456 profile image
Paul123456

This is similar tool but gives progression risks for PV and ET, 10% and 4% respectively every 10 years

mpnconnect.com/myelofibrosi...

Bluetop profile image
Bluetop

Thanks for these Paul. The progression rates are interesting.

Thank you Paul. Great resource to have on hand.

You may also like...

ET Diagnostic Criteria

JAK2 negative. While I understand the p-vera criteria pretty well, I really only have a general...

Something for everyone - MF-PV-ET

Specialists MF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaGhCPfonuc PV...

2016 WHO diagnostic criteria for MPNs

link link the current diagnostic criteria for MPNs. Its from Nature. https://www.nature.com/arti

Criteria for diagnosing ET!

ET and PV - holiday insurance