Promising results for MF Trial - Pacritinib - MPN Voice

MPN Voice

10,634 members14,714 posts

Promising results for MF Trial - Pacritinib

Paul123456 profile image
1 Reply

jamanetwork.com/journals/ja...

A trial comparing pacritinib daily dose of 400mg versus pacritinib daily 2 x 200mg versus Best Available Therapy (BAT).

BAT was primarily Ruxo/Jakafi.

Perhaps the most interesting bit is the number of participants who switched mid trial from BAT to Pacritinib after 24 weeks!

“Conclusions and Relevance:

In patients with myelofibrosis and thrombocytopenia, including those with prior anti-JAK therapy, pacritinib twice daily was more effective than BAT, including ruxolitinib, for reducing splenomegaly and symptoms.”

Hopefully we will soon hear a lot more about Pacritinib and in language more easily assimilated by us laypersons.

Written by
Paul123456 profile image
Paul123456
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
1 Reply
Paul123456 profile image
Paul123456

Here is a video explaining benefits of Pacritinib over Ruxo, especially for MF patients with low Platelets

targetedonc.com/conference/...

However this is dated 2017 and the link above 8th March 2018

I know Pacritinib was suspended (safely concerns) and then re-approved early 2017 but not sure how these two trials connect, sound similar in principle. I assume same trial but 2018 is latest update?

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

A New Cell Therapy Trial for MF

the ph3 clinical trial that includes AML, not clear whether MPN emergent AML is included:...

Do these results suggest that the MF is progressing?

BMB Results Show Grade 3 MF

Anyone with ET that has progressed to MF?

My symptoms have seemed to have progressed - more bone pain, night sweats, bloating, nausea, high...

Finally had BMB. Now diagnosed with MF, should I go on a trial and other questions!

suggested the Limber 313 trial, where Rux is taken with Parsaclisib. Is anyone on this trial with...