Target-specific painkiller labelling. Is ... - Healthy Evidence

Healthy Evidence

3,065 members443 posts

Target-specific painkiller labelling. Is it a clever use of placebo psychology or simply profiteering?

Chris_Peters profile image
Chris_PetersSense About Science
3 Replies

Target specific pain pills turn out to be the same as standard version. And twice the price! Australian court orders manufacturer to remove product from stores. But is this a clever use of placebo psychology or simply a case of a company trying to maximise profits?

Written by
Chris_Peters profile image
Chris_Peters
Sense About Science
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
teessidesitp profile image
teessidesitp

Probably a bit of both but profit is, as usual, the main driver. I believe there is a case for fraud here but I wonder if there is any authority with the guts to go after them.

Gez_Blair profile image
Gez_Blair

I would say a bit of both - I'm sure that they have teams of psychologists that research how to persuade otherwise rational people to pay up to ten times more for a product they could otherwise get for 30p. Even I get sucked into the TV commercials thinking, 'well it looks impressive - blue arrows moving through the airways of the head'.

The Guardian's Suzanne Moore had a pithy comment - the only thing they target is the wallet.

My concern is that somebody could not realise that "targeted ibuprofen" is just the same as bog-standard ibuprofen and end up taking an overdose, by combining the two products.

johnsmith profile image
johnsmith

This does need further investigation. The packets contents may be the same, however the powder construction may be different.

Finer powder means faster absorption.

Powder coating construction may be different. This will change the rate at which the drug is absorbed.

I do not know at this point. Have to wait for the company to make an explanation if they ever do.

A number of years ago a heart drug suddenly started to kill people at what was considered to be safe dosages. It was found that the drug contents had not changed. The manufacturing process had. The new process produced a finer powder. The finer powder was absorbed more quickly resulting in fatal over dosages.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Routine mammography - is it a worthwhile practice or a dogma being supported by vested interest?

Screening makes sense - you find the disease early and treatment can be more effective - or so one...

Are vitamin D pills 'pointless'?

In the news today - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-24473156 - a New Zealand research team...

Sugar tax - a good idea or nanny state nonsense

Well, after alleged attempts by politicians to bury it, the long-awaited report on reducing sugar...

Brain Fog? I've had epilepsy, diabetes 2, etc, and other various medications over my life, I'm 68, any non medications to clear the brain?

I have been stuffed full of medications all my life, reactions to medications very high, now...

E-cigarettes and vaping: good thing or bad thing?

One of our most popular ever topics on Behind the Headlines (apart from advice on how to get Viagra...