Interesting study on PLoS One - highlighting the fact that in the same way the top 1% of the population have a huge share of capital compared to the lowest 10%, a similar inequality exists in science publishing.
plosone.org/article/info%3A...
One percent of scientists are responsible for a whopping 41% of all papers published - and there is a very noticeable elite when it comes to multiple publications per year:
Two or more: 68,221
Three or more: 37,953
Four or more: 23,342
Five or more: 15,464
10 or more: 3269
Should we be concerned about this publishing inequality? Are the other 99% of scientists being unfairly ignored or lack resources and time to publish
Good summary of the paper can be found here
Water fluoridation
This issue is back but do the promoters of fluoridation give you the facts. 
20 years of Epidemiological results and still the Politicians and Medics don`t want you to know the diseases killing 50,000 UK folk
'Tapping Therapy' promoted on NHS despite lack of compelling evidence
Making Sense of Chemical Stories
