Sugar: Thoughtful piece by Anjana Ahuja w... - Healthy Evidence

Healthy Evidence

3,060 members438 posts

Sugar: Thoughtful piece by Anjana Ahuja warning that campaigners will only be trusted if they play it absolutely straight

Emily_Jesper profile image
Emily_JesperPartnerSense About Science
1 Reply

If not, Anjana says companies will seize on uncertainty and inconsistency in the scientific evidence to preserve the status quo. "Quantifying lifestyle factors is not always straightforward. Take the fizzy drinks survey. It did find a correlation between estimated added sugar intake and cardiovascular disease. But the groups being compared were at opposite extremes of the consumption spectrum: either heavy or light consumers. As pointed out by David Spiegelhalter, Winton Professor of the Public Understanding of Risk at Cambridge University, “the increased hazard for moderately different groups is not that great”. Cutting down on added sugar would have substantial benefits for overall public health – but the average person might not benefit that much."

telegraph.co.uk/health/diet...

Written by
Emily_Jesper profile image
Emily_Jesper
Partner
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
1 Reply
JossS profile image
JossS

Interesting piece and you could always complicate it even more. For instance, many people only drink a lot of fizzy drinks in the summer (sales of small bottles from local shops increase in hot weather).

Or the extra sugar intake at Christmas and Easter.

And then someone might spend all week having sweeteners in tea and then go away at the weekend and have sugar.

Just to make it even worse, mammals are programmed to lean towards sweet. Sweet is often safer than sour; sourness might be an indication of poisonous fruit. And sugar = carbon, and as carbon based lifeforms, that is our energy craving.

This is a much more difficult nut to crack than salt, and I am not completely certain that it is a nut worth cracking by legislation. Salt had a point - it was being used to give food that "I want more" edge. However, you don't tend to get food manufactured out of salt, so it is always an additive.

However, there are a lot of food stuffs that simply could not exist without sugar - your local sweet shop has rather a wide selection - and there is a limit to what can use artificial sweetners as a replacement.

I don't have a sweet tooth and it is rare for me to eat a cake, let alone a boiled sweet, but I would be sad to see them go. But you don't need much of either before you have increased your sugar intake enormously, without going near any food that has sugar sneaked in!

You may also like...

Sugar tax - a good idea or nanny state nonsense

reducing sugar consumption in the UK by Public Health England has finally been made public....

Water fluoridation This issue is back but do the promoters of fluoridation give you the facts.

fluoridation is back on gov agenda big press on alleged benefits and many mentions of naturally...

A Greenpeace campaign about “toxic chemicals in clothes” prompted us to ask some questions.

Department of Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards to...

Probiotics - many dubious health claims

evidence of benefit. But the take-home message is there’s little evidence to support most health...

If sugar is bad for you, Is there any evidence to suggest low fat milk is healthier than full fat?

There is a lot of news regarding sugar in the press and it's health consequences. The NHS suggests...