The war against real food: On the general... - Healthy Eating

Healthy Eating

61,571 members8,186 posts

The war against real food

TheAwfulToad profile image
5 Replies

On the general topic of regenerative agriculture and "proper food" from Jerry, you might be interested to know some of the reasons that ethically-raised meat is a niche activity. One big reason is that it's illegal.

It's not quite so bad in the UK, but many of the techniques associated with waste minimization, soil regeneration, and natural foodstuffs are simply forbidden by "heath and safety" rules - the same rules, bizarrely enough, which result in animals being kept in unsanitary conditions, dosed up with prophylactic antibiotics, and generally treated like widgets on a production line instead of sentient beings.

This is an old article, but the rules are still very much in force:

npa-uk.org.uk/Do_not_feed_f...

The TL;DR version is that you cannot feed waste food to pigs. Bear in mind that the UK produces about 20,000 tonnes of food waste every day - enough to feed about 6 million meat hogs. To put that in context, the Brits eat about 10 million pigs a year. In other words, we could theoretically raise most of the pigs we eat on food waste (hogs are typically slaughtered at 8-11 months).

But we don't. We feed them on commercial pignuts, because farmers aren't allowed to do anything else.

If one were being cynical, one might think that perhaps the aim is to ensure the suppliers of animal feedstuffs were guaranteed a nice source of income. But of course that can't be it, can't it? No, the government only wants what's best for us. In particular, they want to make sure those pigs don't get African Swine Fever or foot'n'mouth disease (see the article, above).

Now, neither of these diseases pose any risk to humans. Certainly a farmer stands to lose a lot of money in the case of ASF, but the virus is spread by direct contact or via piggy materials - in other words, the only way a British pig can contract the disease is by eating contaminated, uncooked pork. It would be simple enough to impose rules for pigswill QA (fully cooked, and/or no meat scraps) from commercial kitchens - the same way they are held to standards for human food prep. But no; the government solution is to throw it all into a landfill.

The NPA case for foot'n'mouth prevention is completely threadbare. While the article asserts that the 2001 UK outbreak was caused by catering waste, this is incredibly unlikely - not least because it would have been illegal, ie., a very rare and clandestine occurrence. No F&M epidemic in any other country has been traced to food waste. By far the most likely cause was one of the things we all know about: vast herds kept in filthy pig-slums which are guaranteed to generate epidemics, haulage of live animals across large distances to big slaughterhouses, transmission via human movement, and commercial feeds containing ingredients of dubious provenance.

Healthy pastured pigs are not susceptible to F&M for the same reason healthy humans aren't susceptible to every virus drifting on the breeze. The disease is self-limiting in free ranging herds and of minor concern for the ethical farmer.

The disgraceful diet of farm animals (which ends in a disgraceful diet for us) is merely the thin end of a very large wedge. Everything else that farmers do - every instance of abuse, cruelty, and degradation inflicted on their animals - is ultimately mandated by law.

Let's get some sanity back into farming. Food only gets wasted because bureaucrats demand that it must be wasted. Animals are mistreated because bureaucrats have decided that this is "efficient".

Written by
TheAwfulToad profile image
TheAwfulToad
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
5 Replies

This is really interesting TAT when on one hand we have to prevent animals catching these diseases when really we should be improving the standards so the catering waste doesn't pose a risk in the first instance.

We have farm animals being fed antibiotics and growth hormones and don't question whether these affect us the consumer, when we literally are what we eat.

So I agree lets get some sanity back into farming so it is sustainable and healthy for the animals us the consumer.

Again the big business mantra of cost cost cost and never ending cost cutting actually costs too much...

Thanks for posting this.

Jerry.

TheAwfulToad profile image
TheAwfulToad in reply to

The concern about disease vectors is obviously a valid one. Farm animals must be protected for economic reasons and for human health. The current solution, however, not only results in unintended consequences, it doesn't even work. The system that farmers use is inherently brittle: any random person can introduce disease into it, and create a snowballing epidemic, simply because that's the way the whole thing is set up. Banning the use of catering waste utterly misses the big picture.

andyswarbs profile image
andyswarbs

I think it is because of consumer demand. Beaurocrats are the middlemen & women satisfying that demand.

ChubbieChops profile image
ChubbieChops

Oh dear, yet another reason to get depressed.

MTCee profile image
MTCee

Ever thought of becoming a politician TAT? 😁

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Healthy smoothie recipies

Hi, first time here so I thought I'd just dive straight in... I've been making up smoothies...

Very happy with my new eating regime 🙂

So following my heart attack and 3 stents on 27th Feb 23 I have now achieved my ideal weight...

“Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food”

Hi folks, That quote is not referring to any old food like the man-made food you can buy in the...

Food for osteoarthritis

Hi all, I have had back /neck problems for 20 years. In the early days I had x ray on lumbar region...

Let’s start our week with healthy eating awareness! ❤️☀️☮️☯️🌻🧘🏻‍♀️🌈🙏

According to Harvard school of public health: The American heart association suggests an...