The potential of using circulating tu... - Fight Prostate Ca...

Fight Prostate Cancer

2,802 members1,032 posts

The potential of using circulating tumour cells and their gene expression to predict docetaxel response in metastatic PCa: 14 Dec 2022.

cujoe profile image
7 Replies

This will be an interesting paper when the complete research is available, as it looks to ID markers from liquid biopsies as identifying efficacy for docetaxel. Here is the text from the Frontiers in Oncology paper noted as : Provisionally accepted: The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

* * *

Docetaxel improves overall survival (OS) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) (CRPC) and metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC). However, not all patients respond due to inherent and/or acquired resistance. There remains an unmet clinical need for a robust predictive test to stratify patients for treatment. Liquid biopsy of circulating tumour cell (CTCs) is minimally invasive, can provide real-time tumour information of the heterogeneous tumour and therefore may be a potentially ideal docetaxel response prediction biomarker.

In this study we investigate the potential of using CTCs and their gene expression to predict post-docetaxel tumour response, OS and progression free survival (PFS).

Methods: Peripheral blood was sampled from 18 mCRPC and 43 mHSPC patients, pre-docetaxel treatment, for CTC investigation. CTCs were isolated using the epitope independent Parsortix® system and gene expression was determined by multiplex RT-qPCR. We evaluated CTC measurements for post-docetaxel outcome prediction using receiver operating characteristics and Kaplan Meier analysis.

Detection of CTCs pre-docetaxel was associated with poor patient outcome post-docetaxel treatment. Combining total-CTC number with PSA and ALP predicted lack of partial response (PR) with an AUC of 0.90, p= 0.037 in mCRPC.

A significantly shorter median OS was seen in mCRPC patients with positive CTC-score (12.80 vs. 37.33 months, HR= 5.08, p= 0.0005), ≥3 total-CTCs/7.5mL (12.80 vs. 37.33 months, HR= 3.84, p= 0.0053), ≥1 epithelial-CTCs/7.5mL (14.30 vs. 37.33 months, HR= 3.89, p= 0.0041) or epithelial to mesenchymal transitioning (EMTing)-CTCs/7.5mL (11.32 vs. 32.37 months, HR= 6.73, p= 0.0001).

Significantly shorter PFS was observed in patients with ≥2 epithelial-CTCs/7.5mL (7.52 vs. 18.83 months, HR= 3.93, p= 0.0058). mHSPC patients with ≥5 CTCs/7.5mL had significantly shorter median OS (24.57 vs undefined months, HR= 4.14, p= 0.0097).

In mHSPC patients, expression of KLK2, KLK4, ADAMTS1, ZEB1 and SNAI1 was significantly associated with shorter OS and/or PFS. Importantly, combining CTC measurements with clinical biomarkers increased sensitivity and specificity for prediction of patient outcome.

While it is clear that CTC numbers and gene expression were prognostic for PCa post-docetaxel treatment, and CTC subtype analysis may have additional value, their potential predictive value for docetaxel chemotherapy response needs to be further investigated in large patient cohorts.

* * *

Here is the link to the paper:

The potential of using circulating tumour cells and their gene expression to predict docetaxel response in metastatic prostate cancer - Frontiers in Oncology, Sec. Genitourinary Oncology, Received: 03 Oct 2022; Accepted: 14 Dec 2022.

frontiersin.org/articles/10...

This might be the guide PCa patients (and MOs) need to make a decision to use Docetaxel and avoid unnecessary toxicities if it is likely to not be effective. I'll try to update when the full paper is published.

Stay Well - Ciao - K9

Written by
cujoe profile image
cujoe
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
7 Replies
6357axbz profile image
6357axbz

who is the lead(s) on this study?

cujoe profile image
cujoe in reply to 6357axbz

Sorry, I forgot to add the link to the paper. An international authorship, but no US participation. I'll add the link to the original post.

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply to cujoe

Thanks. Dr Amir Goldcorn (US) has worked with CTCs and did a trial. He’s not involved in this it seems.

cujoe profile image
cujoe in reply to 6357axbz

One issue is if the "epitope independent Parsortix® system and gene expression . . . multiplex RT-qPCR" labs would be available outside of a clinical trial/research setting.

MateoBeach profile image
MateoBeach

Well this appears to be a huge (valuable and useful) additional tool when making a decision about whether to undergo docetaxel chemo for metastatic PC. They don’t define in this abstract exactly what their “CTC index” is, apparently combining PSA and ALP with CTC counts.

However, it appears evident that having no detectable CTCs would be an encouraging indication for the response to chemo. Even a few per 7.5ml, or 1+ epithelial, or with EMT cut OS from around 3 years to around 1 year. So one might look to another treatment option than the chemo. I wonder how this might overlap with what is coming out about cancer stem cell (CSC) markers?

“A significantly shorter median OS was seen in mCRPC patients with positive CTC-score (12.80 vs. 37.33 months, HR= 5.08, p= 0.0005), ≥3 total-CTCs/7.5mL (12.80 vs. 37.33 months, HR= 3.84, p= 0.0053), ≥1 epithelial-CTCs/7.5mL (14.30 vs. 37.33 months, HR= 3.89, p= 0.0041) or epithelial to mesenchymal transitioning (EMTing)-CTCs/7.5mL (11.32 vs. 32.37 months, HR= 6.73, p= 0.0001”

cujoe profile image
cujoe

MB - Always good to get your big brain insiders view of such research. As I think you already know, I'm not a big fan of chemo - as I have seen/still seeing its side effects on family members for all of my adult life. (Granted, not PCa-related . . . but still . . .)

However, being able to predict docetaxel's efficacy might change my opinion, so I will watch for the final paper and depending on that, may even see if I can get any more specific info from its lead researcher(s). The intriguing aspect is that they tested a significant number mHSPC patients prior to treatment in reaching their conclusions about the value of CTC testing for outcomes.

As is usually the case, more information leads to better decisions. (or, at least, should.)

Thanks for the input & Have a Special Holiday this year - You've earned it!

Ciao - K9

NPfisherman profile image
NPfisherman

K9 Terror,

Precision medicine continues to evolve, and this is what should drive treatment decisions and effect outcomes. I suspect at some point, that your treatment plan will be determined by an AI that is fed all of your DNA mutations, biopsy results, etc and predicts what should be your best treatment option to maximize life expectancy. The key is getting new classes of drugs, vaccines, and treatments that can be added into "the mix", and thus, provide more options...

The Science is Coming, but we need those Phase III trials sooner. Stop screwing us around Big Pharma, and cut a deal with smaller biotechs, and save lives...

DD

You may also like...

New strategies against bone metastases from prostate cancer - Science Daily

bone metastases also had characteristics that predict response to immunotherapy. Doctors and...