A flying SPARK?: Full day clinic visit... - Cure Parkinson's

Cure Parkinson's

26,575 members27,881 posts

A flying SPARK?

WinnieThePoo profile image
33 Replies

Full day clinic visit today. 11 blood samples, all the paper and physical tests, a urine test I managed not to fail, and an appointment to see Dr Brefel.

Where finally I got to see my datscans from the trial.

A trial for which I had to sign 3 consent changes. Partly because of covid19 precautions. Mostly because they have changed the primary objective after more than 2 years, just before the trial is due to end in March 2021

The primary objective is no longer safety and tolerability. Now, the primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of BIIB054 via dose response using the change from baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Total Score.

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

I wonder why 🤔

Written by
WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
33 Replies
wifeofparky profile image
wifeofparky

Sounds like you are in Phase three of the drug trials where they determine the best dosage for efficacy

jimcaster profile image
jimcaster

That sounds encouraging to me. I have no scientific or medical background at all, but I've always wondered why efficacy is only evaluated after safety has been established. If you're giving stuff to people, you might as well see if it works. I totally understand that Phase 3 studies are needed with a much bigger sample size, but it still seems like efficacy should be evaluated earlier. Good luck and please keep us updated. 😊

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply tojimcaster

The trial is phase 2 although a large quad blind multi center one. It seems inconceivable that the results have not been positive

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply toWinnieThePoo

That's to say why would you change the trial criteria from win if its safe to win if it works 3months from the end of the trial?

Unless the results tell you that you would win on the new criteria

jimcaster profile image
jimcaster in reply toWinnieThePoo

Yes. Exactly what I was thinking. I sure hope so!!

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply tojimcaster

I suppose one possibility is a high incidence of serious adverse events.

jimcaster profile image
jimcaster in reply toWinnieThePoo

I suppose that's possible, but obviously they would have just stopped if the adverse affects were too frequent or too serious. All in all, I think it is more likely a positive sign, but time will tell.

Farooqji profile image
Farooqji

Wishing you all the best. Keep us updated ❤️

Parkinsonjisung profile image
Parkinsonjisung

Did you find out if you got the active drug?

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply toParkinsonjisung

I know I've been on the active drug this year, but not the dose. I won't find out more before march when the trial ends

Parkinsonjisung profile image
Parkinsonjisung in reply toWinnieThePoo

Is the primary objective for the score to be lower or slowed down? Wasnt clear in the trial link

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply toParkinsonjisung

I don't know but I think the hope was to slow or best case halt progression, not reverse the disease

Parkinsonjisung profile image
Parkinsonjisung in reply toWinnieThePoo

Thanks for the info. I presumed the same. Be interesting to see what they deem success

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo

I forgot to mention. My datscans showed no change. My neurologist told me that's normal and to be expected. You won't see any change over 6 months or even a year.

Fine. So why do one every 6months on the trial if it's normal for there to be no change?

in reply toWinnieThePoo

They probably want to 'catch' any big outliers early. They anticipate the normal, but want to know about that which is not normal.

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply to

michaeljfox.org/news/ask-md... suggests that there are significant differences in the first 4 years and that trials are using them to monitor effect. My next datscan, which I will try to see, is on Thursday 17th, which will be 30 months after the first one which confirmed my original diagnosis.

I'm happy with no change for now

1LittleWillow profile image
1LittleWillow in reply toWinnieThePoo

Is contrast required for Datscans?

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply to1LittleWillow

Sorry but I don't understand what you mean by contrast

in reply toWinnieThePoo

The injection. So yes.

1LittleWillow profile image
1LittleWillow in reply toWinnieThePoo

Sorry! I wanted to know if they administer some type of contrast medium through an IV prior to the scan. I haven't had one, so haven't researched them.

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply to1LittleWillow

Yes. There is a radioactive tracer, and so i take potassium iodide on the eve of the injection, the morning of the injection and the following day to protect my thyroid

1LittleWillow profile image
1LittleWillow in reply toWinnieThePoo

I see. Thanks for the reply!

MEW11 profile image
MEW11

Thank you for participating and updating us.

amykp profile image
amykp

Are you saying they tell you the results of your DaTscans? I'm nearing the end of a 3yr Sanofi trial for a new drug called venglustat and they won't breathe a whisper on mine. And they won't promise to release them at the end either...I keep asking.

If I could add a little huffy emoji here, I would! :o)

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply toamykp

It was like pulling teeth. I could only be shown them by my consultant neurologist and they kept failing to arrange it. I don't think they would do it routinely. And i am a bit of a celebrity as the Englishman in FranceHope your trial is a successful one. Thank you for participating

amykp profile image
amykp in reply toWinnieThePoo

So, what do YOU think? Do you get any sense that your progression is slower than average?

BTW, when I began my trial I struggled with a choice between the study you are in or the one I am in. They both sounded quite promising. In the end I chose mine only because it happens to be specific to my genetics (I carry the GBA mutation).

I was already thinking: if could leap into yours next...or another similar antibody-to-alpha-syn-trial, I would!

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply toamykp

I'm puzzled that there could be any other conclusion. My team were playing it cool - lots of Gallic shrugs and "we don't know, we'll have to wait and see"This time though, unlike the previous revisions I've signed, it's public published information.

So why hasn't the Biogen share price reacted? (There was a one day spike about the time the revision was published, but that makes even less sense)

Personally, I'm confused. I could have been on placebo last year and low dose this year, so would expect no benefit. To add to the confusion, i missed 2 infusions due to lockdown, started, stopped and restarted pramipexole due to a cough, severe breathing difficulties and heavy fatigue (which have now gone and not returned after restarting pramipexole, and may well have been covid19), and have tried 3 times to take B1.

My PD is unambiguously progressed from diagnosis, whatever the datscans show.

But

It's pretty mild. Dr Brefel asked the same question after examining me and concluded that my PD on Friday was almost undetectable (i was at my very best during her exam. It was more evident later in the day for the trial tests). I had not taken my pramipexole that morning, as instructed by the trial, so it was 28 hours since the last dose. I admitted I was not really too badly troubled by the pd, and that although I wanted to stay on the pramipexole, I wouldn't be that bothered if i couldn't. And i agreed that was different from 12 months ago, when I had a real urgency to start a symptomatic treatment.

I think I was on placebo year 1 and this year I'm not (that's to say - it's different this year). And maybe, although I'm progressed from diagnosis, and that's how I think of myself, maybe , ok probably, I'm better than a year ago.

Certainly my wife thinks so

amykp profile image
amykp in reply toWinnieThePoo

That sounds VERY promising, to me! I would say my symptoms have progressed, but I think unusually slowly. I'm still one-sided. I still don't require dopamine, and I still think no one can tell...unless I'm nervous and then I get shaky.

I'm pretty sure I was NOT on the placebo.

But I just started on Neupro, 4mg patch...for restless legs at night. I'm pretty certain that's PD related.

I also eat a super strict diet and exercise a lot...so there's that confounding issue.

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply toamykp

Sounds good. It is so hard to know what "normal" progress would be - in this "snowflake" disease. The neupro is a 24/7 dopamine agonist so will be working similar to my extended release Pramipexole. How long ago were you diagnosed? and how long were you on the trial for?

My normal trial ends in January but I have a 2 month extension to March - when the last entrant finishes their 2 years

amykp profile image
amykp in reply toWinnieThePoo

A snowflake disease...right. So who can know? I was diagnosed in June of 2015.

It is/was a three year trial that for me ends this coming February. I'm actually on the warpath for a new trial now...but I'm having trouble finding one, and you might too. If you are far (year-wise) into your diagnosis you are disqualified from "early" studies, but if you are still phase 1 you are disqualified from "late" studies.

Frustrating.

PalmSprings profile image
PalmSprings

Thanks for the update. Wow, so interesting. I have everything crossed that I can, hoping for significantly positive results. Cheers.

WinnieThePoo profile image
WinnieThePoo in reply toPalmSprings

Thanks. Obviously I hope the drug is proven to significantly slow progress . Then we have to hope they have enough data from a phase 2 trial with over 300 participants to get early fda / ema approval. Fingers crossed

Parkinsonjisung profile image
Parkinsonjisung

I wonder if the change in the success criteria is linked to biogens alzheimer drug which has got so much publicity. I doubt they really want to go through a phase 3 again with the effacey in doubt

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

"Just a little prick" - a SPARK update

I know I've used it before, and it's corny - but, honestly. Yesterday! (The French is "Je......

SPARK - BIIB054 (mostly for Gio)

When Gio asked me to post something , I thought I had posted about this before, but reviewing my...

Another bright SPARK

As I write , I am newly brim full of BIIB054 after 2 months missed due to "le confinement" as the...

Covid-19 Update: Remdesivir US Trial Results fail to live up to expectations, or does it? It depends on what you want to believe.

My observations are my own and based on my extensive experience conducting clinical trials. I am...
sharoncrayn profile image

Annovis Bio Announces First Patient Dosed in Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Early Parkinson’s Disease

Annovis Bio Announces First Patient Dosed in Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Early Parkinson’s...