The results they present are confusing. They say only 78 people out of over 1000 who registered consumed Mannitol more than 6 months.
They say 56% report of improvement in their Parkinson’s grade and symptoms.
But then they say
90% regained sense of smell;
86% improved their facial expression
81% improved their gait
etc.
I think these numbers are presented in a confusing fashion. When I first saw this, I assumed that 90% of people who took mannitol for 6 months regained their sense of smell. WOW! That would be massively impressive. But that doesn't make sense.
When I stop and think about it, I realize that what they actually are probably saying is this: 90% OF THE 56% WHO SHOWED ANY IMPROVEMENTS AT ALL regained their sense of smell, or ACTUALLY 50% of the 78 people. SO NOT REALLY 90%.
And that also leaves out potentially hundreds of people (a large percentage) who may have stopped taking mannitol before 6 months because they saw no noticible benefits.
My main reason for writing is to say that anyone who casually glances at the figures on for Clinicrowd may get an inflated sense of the efficacy of mannitol.
I am not saying mannitol isn't good or useful, it may very well be. This is more a plea for a more clear and balanced way of presenting the results.