Probably, you've all heard of the recent ... - Cure Parkinson's

Cure Parkinson's

26,583 members27,899 posts

Probably, you've all heard of the recent study from Harvard that disses on the low-carb diet. Here's a rebuttal.

MBAnderson profile image
13 Replies

health.harvard.edu/healthbe...

"Latest Low-Carb Study: All Politics, No Science"

"The only evidence to be found in this research is evidence of bias."

Posted Sep 05, 2018

psychologytoday.com/us/blog...

Written by
MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
13 Replies
park_bear profile image
park_bear

It is appalling how much propaganda and misinformation show up in medical journals. Here is something I wrote up regarding extremely egregious example:

Junk Science, Bad Reporting Propagate Unhealthy Misinformation Regarding Supplements

tinyurl.com/yay9yza2

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson in reply topark_bear

This is quite an article. It'll take me a couple days to digest it. You publish under the name "wilderness voice?" That has more cachet than park_bear. I signed up for KOS and I'm a follower. Thank you for all your contributions.

I am so impressed with so many people on this forum. It's really remarkable.

park_bear profile image
park_bear in reply toMBAnderson

Yes, I publish under the name wilderness voice at Daily Kos. Thank you for putting in the effort to fully grok that article - it is a case in point of how to do a bad review of studies. Executive summary: they cherry picked studies to get the adverse result they wanted.

The rebuttal is not a rebuttal of the Harvard paper. The Harvard paper does not “diss” low carb diets but is a timely reminder that while carbs might be restricted, they cannot just be replaced with anything. What they are replaced with is important. I would have thought that that message is appropriate.

PDConscience profile image
PDConscience

MDA, That’s a pretty revealing article (Psych-Today) - especially when contrasted against the summary of the lacking Harvard ‘study’. It kind of boggles the mind how such a thoroughly flawed methodology ultimately clears peer review and makes it into print.

In the end the perpetual dilemma remains: Within each of the ‘macro’ categories (fat/carb/protein) lie both healthy and unhealthy sources, the ‘ideal’ composition of which ultimately depends on the unique biochemistry (esp. microbiome) of the individual.

The rebuttal that you refer to reads like the real propaganda to me. We humans have the enzyme ptyalin in our saliva so that starch digestion can begin inside the mouth while chewing our carb foods such as grass seeds, grain or bread This is an example of genetic blueprint. Another example of genetic blueprint is that our body is designed to conserve salt, and to excrete large amounts of potassium. A predominantly vegetarian diet is rich in potassium. The so-called paleo diet is a myth. Humans have rice based diets, corn based diets, wheat based diets, millet, sorghum, buckwheat, barley etc. There has always been a lot of medical propaganda. Syphilis appeared in Europe after the return of Columbus and his crew, and for many hundreds of years, doctors treated it with various forms of mercury, and no one will ever know how many people were killed by mercury poisoning. Penicillin was discovered in the 1940's. The real cause of stomach ulcers turned out to be gut bacteria. Gut bacteria also play a role in Parkinson's disease. Various diseases have been blamed on protein deficiencies, when the problem all along was gut bacteria. As long as a person has enough food to eat, it is impossible for them not to have enough protein, unless they are just eating French fries, or just eating fruit. Such crazy people do exist. The entire history of medicine is awash with propaganda.

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson

Because reading articles by nutritionist is like reading articles by economists (in that they are both all over the map,) for me, the prudent course is to hedge my bet and not to go all in on a particular diet.

For myself, I’m going with low-ish (one third of calories from) carbs, high-fat, and moderate protein because of the many deleterious effects of high and fluctuating glucose, especially on our microbiome and its role in the autoimmune response and the role of autoimmune in PD.

This link is a good panel discussion from a recent conference in Switzerland called, “The Science and Politics of Nutrition” with panelists supporting both positions on low fat vs low-carb.

youtube.com/watch?v=7Eby6L0...

park_bear profile image
park_bear

It is a pity that all carbs fall under one classification. It is true they will turn sugar eventually, eventually being the operative word. Nonetheless there is a vast difference between ingesting sugars versus complex carbs, because the complex carbs turn to sugar slowly, whereas sugars are absorbed quickly. It is the ingested sugars that wreak havoc with blood sugar levels, ultimately resulting in type II diabetes if done to excess. High blood sugar also damages arteries which leads to cardiovascular disease.

I choose what to eat based on whatever seems the most appealing at the moment. I figure that is my body's way of telling me what it wants to have.

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson in reply topark_bear

Good points, good explanation. I should be careful to talk in terms of glycemic index and glycemic load.

Here's another good explanation.

lpi.oregonstate.edu/mic/foo...

Lucky you - getting to eat what's most appealing. If I did that, I'd be a brittle diabetic or dead.

park_bear profile image
park_bear in reply toMBAnderson

I should have included what is most appealing in my refrigerator or cupboard. I implement my diet by what I buy at the supermarket. Being your basic bear, there is no hope of any self-control if the food is within paws' reach.

JAS9 profile image
JAS9 in reply topark_bear

Yes, and whole foods help mitigate the glycemic load of other foods, so not eating unprocessed carbs makes negative sense: youtube.com/watch?v=AoHvkrc...

park_bear profile image
park_bear in reply toJAS9

A lot of good information packed into that video!

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson

Another critique of the Harvard study by Nina Teicholz

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/239...

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

What makes a good life? Lessons from the longest-running study on happiness; 75 year long Harvard study; TED Talk; video 12:46 mi

https://www.ted.com/talks/robert_waldinger_what_makes_a_good_life_lessons_from_the_longest_study_on_
MBAnderson profile image

A RECENT STUDY TO CONFIRM THE GOOD NEWS THAT MOST MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM ALREADY KNEW!!!

In this recent study that just came out last week, it was determined that 8 weeks of moderate...

SoPD blog post from Simon on the recent results from the NADPARK trial of nicotinamide riboside (Niagen)

"[Researchers] have found that nicotinamide riboside can increase energy levels in the brains of...
jeffreyn profile image

Recent PGK1 and Terazosin Study

PGK1 and Terazosin has been discussed before on this site. A new study (link below) published on...
Mezmerric profile image

Gluten free , low lectins lifestyle

Who else has adopted a gluten free , low or no lectins, low carb lifestyle? I have been gluten...