- Human beings are susceptible to the latest nutritional trends, regardless of their actual biological value.
Janet Chrzan is Adjunct Assistant Professor of Nutrition at the University of Pennsylvania and received her PhD in physical/nutritional anthropology from the University of Pennsylvania.
the-scientist.com/reading-f...
Scan the aisles any bookstore and you will find a multitude of diet books, from general “healthy eating” cookbooks to specific or clinical how-to books focusing on various dietary regimens, such as gluten-free and ketogenic. If one were to read them all, it would be very confusing indeed. Some forbid fats, while others warn against carbohydrates and sugars; some encourage a narrow range of particular foods, while others specifically ban certain items. In a year or two, these books will be available at your local thrift shop, priced at $1 each. That’s because, like the diet recommendations that came before them, many of these diet guidelines will soon be abandoned, either because they don’t work or because they have been replaced by the next popular food regimen.
Janet Chrzan examines the Paleo diet in particular, noting that Paleo is also popular because the cultural meanings attached to “going paleo” signify social status, identity, and wellness. Many people believe that evolutionary nutrition promises optimal health, but it’s difficult to reconstruct ancient diets because of the incomplete nature of the archeological record and because much of humans’ diverse omnivorous diet does not fossilize.
Paleo encourages belief in keto, gluten-free, and clean diets. When examined together, it’s clear that fad diets really aren’t about the food, but they do signal group belonging and self-identity—two qualities central to the psychological health of most humans. And because they fulfill social (if not nutritional) goals, fad diets make cultural sense.
Most of us re-evaluate our diet when we are diagnosed, which can be a worthwhile exercise, because most of us can make healthier choices. However there is more evidence that improving our fitness can help us live better with our CLL than dietary changes. In particular, study after study has found no benefit from adding supplements to our diet, unless we are deficient in a specific vitamin, etc. Even then, we are generally better off sourcing this from foods than supplements.
I consider the likelihood of curing our CLL through dietary changes as exceedingly low as I explain in this two part post:healthunlocked.com/cllsuppo...
Also I don't believe that there is one diet which suits everyone. Our optimal diet is probably as heterogeneous as is our CLL.
Neil