Optimizing Treatment of Patients With Relapsed... - CLL Support

CLL Support

23,335 members40,040 posts

Optimizing Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
14 Replies

This is a short paper setting out the non trial option for patients needing treatment after a targeted therapy

jnccn.org/view/journals/jnc...

Jackie

Written by
Jm954 profile image
Jm954
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
14 Replies
cllady01 profile image
cllady01Former Volunteer

Thank you, Jackie. That is a very readable and relatable read.

I hope you are doing well.

johnliston profile image
johnliston

Jackie, I did I/V the first time around and I don't see any reason it shouldn't work the second time. The time limited treatment and combination should inhibit the development of mutations and I haven't seen and data on clonal selection. So someone will have to tell me why it shouldn't work the second time or even the third time.

Except maybe cost.

john

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply tojohnliston

I agree :)

alpek profile image
alpek in reply toJm954

There was an update posted on the captivate trial linked below that discussed Ibrutinib re-treatment response.

"As of April 2022, a total of 12 patients who experienced disease progression following fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax were retreated with ibrutinib monotherapy. The duration of single-agent ibrutinib retreatment in these patients ranged from 6 months to 32 months. Of the 11 patients determined to response evaluable, 9 were found to have a PR to retreatment, 1 had a PR-L, and 1 achieved stable disease."

onclive.com/view/updated-ca...

annmcgowan profile image
annmcgowan

Thank you Jackie very interesting. Can I ask if this applies to the U.K.? If so are these options open to all of us on the NHS now?

I remain on the Flair trial but will stop in around 18 months. Hope to be part of the static trial but don’t know if it is set up locally yet.

I hope your own health is going well.

Ann

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply toannmcgowan

They are available in England, Scotland and Wales Ann.

STATIC seems to be endlessly delayed :(

annmcgowan profile image
annmcgowan in reply toJm954

Thank you Jackie. Take care

Ann

CLLerinOz profile image
CLLerinOzAdministrator

Thanks, Jackie, What a great summary article. I really liked the easy to follow chart, too.

Follow up treatment choices after targeted therapy for CLL
LeoPa profile image
LeoPa

Isn't Pirtobrutinib a pi3k inhibitor? Isn't that the same as a non covalent BTK inhibitor? I think I'm lost here 🙂

MrMidnight profile image
MrMidnight in reply toLeoPa

As I understand it, Pirtobrutinib (Loxo-305) is a noncovalent BTK inhibitor. Idealalisib is a pi3k inhibitor.

LeoPa profile image
LeoPa in reply toMrMidnight

Thanks!

Justasheet1 profile image
Justasheet1

BTK and PI3K are different pathways for signaling in the B cell.

Pirtobrutinib is more akin to ibrutinib; hence the name.

LeoPa profile image
LeoPa in reply toJustasheet1

Thanks!

Smakwater profile image
Smakwater

Thanks for the read Jackie,

In other data it appears that venetaclax is still weighing well across all measures for front line. From this article it seem to be second to the covalent BTK's for progressive disease/recurrent CLL when venetoclax was the frontline treatment (84% to 72.2% OS). I learned yesterday that it is acceptable for venetaclax to be used as a monotherapy in relapse wherein the probability of TLS is low. What I mean is that if one is treated before the tumor burden progresses, there is no need to be pre treated with obinutuzumab. This would then not be an option for those with high WBC and no other symptoms, rather it would be used for patients with low counts and specific severe symptoms including night sweats, and fatigue.

It sounds to me like there is a building consensus that Ibrutinib is becoming a favorable way to pre treat for venetaclax whether front line or relapse. Although I am not yet swayed to believe that BTK's are better debulking agents than Obinutuzumab, We should all keep an eye on this, because although Obinutuzumab is a very efficacious CLL drug, it is known to deplete healthy B cells as well as the cancer cells.

My personal add is that I am now 44 months from beginning O+V and yesterday I received verification that my Flow Cytometry reveals no CLL. Although the term MRD negative was not expressed, I understood the result to be just that. All of my labs have been within range for the past two years with the exception of IgM being slightly low. My neutrophils have recovered, however, they also are trending on the lower end.

Given that I am unmutated IGHV, I am very pleased to share this result and to offer encouragement to anyone facing treatment.

My problems are now that I am living longer, I have to deal with the other ugly aging challenges.

Cheerio!

JM

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Hi I'm new here and have been researching. This is my story. Late oct. 2016 during a routine...

FDA Approves Zanubrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphom

FDA Approves Zanubrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Jan 19,...
lankisterguy profile image
Volunteer

Small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)

Yesterday I spent a little while looking at the peculiarities and similarities of CLL and SLL and...
HAIRBEAR_UK profile image
Founder Admin

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment algorithm 2022

This 29 November 2022 review article published in the Blood Cancer Journal presents an...
CLLerinOz profile image
Administrator

Results on triple combination (A+V+O) for high risk patients -with-chronic-lymphocytic-leukemia-or-small-lymphocytic-lymphoma-cll

The Bottom Line: In this ongoing trial, the triple combination therapy using acalabrutinib,...
spi3 profile image