CLL and CD38 marker: Hi When I was first... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,532 members38,709 posts

CLL and CD38 marker

Fkatcake profile image
6 Replies

Hi

When I was first diagnosed I was told I was CD38 negative. My doctor said at the time that this is a positive but I was too shocked at the diagnosis to ask exactly what it meant.

Can anyone give me some clarity as to what this means as a marker?

Thank you

Written by
Fkatcake profile image
Fkatcake
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
6 Replies
AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilPartnerFounder Admin

If you are CD38 negative, that corresponds with a longer time to treatment than if you are CD38 positive. It also correlates with around a 60% chance of being IGHV mutated, though the two markers are independent. For that reason, CD38 status can change over time, while IGHV status is unlikely to change.

Neil

Fkatcake profile image
Fkatcake in reply to AussieNeil

Thank you Neil for your very helpful reply. Would I have been tested for IGHV mutation at diagnosis? It is something I will discuss at my next appointment.

Ann

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilPartnerFounder Admin in reply to Fkatcake

It's rather unlikely that your IGHV was tested at diagnosis, as in the UK it only needs to be done when you are approaching the need for starting treatment. If you are IGHV mutated, you are likely to have a long long remission on chemoimmunotherapy (typically BR or FCR).

CD markers are reported as part of the immunophenotype flow cytometry testing, used to determine what, if any, blood cancer you may have.

Neil

Fkatcake profile image
Fkatcake in reply to AussieNeil

Thank you Neil for your very useful info.

Just for a bit of background , I was diagnosed 5.5 years ago and tend to not think too much about it apart from trying not to catch infections.

I now feel that Covid is making me feel very vulnerable and I've started to take more notice of my condition. My consultant just goes off my WBC and lymphocytes count every 6 months. It's now 26 and 20 respectively and she just says I'm fine!

Best regards

cajunjeff profile image
cajunjeff in reply to Fkatcake

Hello fkatcake, I see you are in the UK. From what I gather about standard protocol in the UK, it’s unlikely you had IGHV testing at diagnosis.

My assumption is that IGHV testing in the UK is considered unnecessary because it is prognostic only and not used to inform treatment choice. You would get a FISH test before treating because it does inform treatment decisions. The standard treatment in the UK for Cll is FCR, a type of chemotherapy. Those who have 17p Cll as shown by FISH do not get FCR.

I would argue that IGHV testing is not just prognostic and does inform treatment choice as there is a growing trend not to give anyone chemotherapy if they have IGHV unmutated Cll, regardless of whether it is 17p or not. I suspect in the UK with the NHS and skyrocketing health care costs, not doing routine IGHV testing is done for budgetary reasons.

CD 38 is a type of protein found on the surface of Cll cells by a blood test done to confirm if you have Cll. When that protein is over expressed, one is considered CD38 positive. As Neil wrote, the odds are you have mutated IGHV Cll as there is a correlation between CD38 and mutation status, but it’s not a perfect correlation. Even if you have unmutated IGHV Cll, it’s still better to be CD 38 negative as you are.

Fkatcake profile image
Fkatcake in reply to cajunjeff

Thank you JeffYou and Neil have given me some useful info and many thanks for your time

Regards Ann

You may also like...

CD38 In CLL

if mutated or not. The doctor did confirm I'm don't have 17p but I do have CD38.. according to...

Anxiety CLL/recently diagnosed/cd38

show I am positive CD38 which has scared me more than when I just knew I had CLL. Doctor said I...

CLL Unmutated CD38 92%

test shows CD 38 positive 92%? Does the percentage over 30% matter or is positive positive. Also I...

CLL and skin issues/genetic markers

and it said that my markers were not the typical markers found in cll but they were not the markers...

A recent consultation with a CLL specialist, and confirmation of genetic markers

comprehend why, therefore I am posting it to see what your experiences are. Other parameters are...