At the Oxford meeting, Anna Schuh put forward that there is a lot of evidence that CLLers don't like the W&W term (too passive - is anything going on? etc - caused patient worry) and she put forward that it is really Active Surveillance (AS).
Personally, I can cope with W&W, but what do others think?
If as a group we prefer AS, should we not be doing something about it?....like use the term here and on all literature and in discussion with our docs? Change will only happen slowly, but if we don't do it, it will never happen.
If there is a switch...I have to learn to spell surveillance (without spellcheck!).....
Written by
Quarry
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Maybe we should do it just to be proactive, to demonstrate control over our own destinies (or at least a short period of our inevitable...). I never minded the 'watch' word, but 'wait' made me feel helpless and manipulated. WAIT WOMAN, YOUR TURN WILL COME. Ouch
Hi Safta (and Quarry), Yes, I like the idea of demonstrating some control over our destinies, even if it's only with words. Not that I minded "Watch and Wait", but between us all, I think we could come up with something better. Maybe "Active Surveillance", or something else that is easier to spell... Any more ideas out there?
By the way, I loved your comment of "WAIT WOMAN, YOUR TURN WILL COME. Ouch". It really made me smile
I think Dr Schuh also emphasised how the words don;t encourage people to be proactive not just the patients? Maybe it gives the wrong message to those in general medicine too? My first blog here when we started was about how we could change this I think I suggested slightly different words but , perhaps you're right quarry it should start with us.?
New medicine and treatments around the corner may change this as a catch all and in fact it already has for some. A description that suggests there is no action may no longer be correct?
Is not CCTV surveillance to recording................. until someone looks at it?! You have not read enough 'Government is conspiring to monitor you' books!!! ...perhaps a short stint in the US mid-west could help!!
How about a brain-storming session? Everyone suggest alternative wordings for W&W, then have a poll to choose the favourite. We could try and use words/phrases that sound positive and pro-active, that communicate stuff like improving basic health, learning new things, educating friends, preparing for battle (well maybe not that), enjoying life while we can.... etc etc...
It needs to be short and punchy as well... not so easy... but it would be good to see people's suggestions.
I am quite happy with Watch and Wait, and the old W&W, it does what it says on the tin. Personally I am not keen on Active Surveillance, with my over active imagination I imagine someone in the bushes outside my widow watching me through binoculars. Thanks for the discussion on this though ...... and very other subject and information, it is comforting not to feel alone.
Active .... care / management does it for me jangreen.
Watch & Wait sounds like there is nothing to worry about, or that nothing will affect you until you need treatment.
After treatment you are then ...... back on W&W ... healed ? ... nearly healed ?? .... a wee bit healed ???
It would be useful when explaining CLL to healthcare staff, GP'S, nurses, dentists etc, or the DWP when trying to access benefits, that living with CLL is not just a matter of watching and waiting.
Loads of great points from a very unrepresentative sample! How to summarise?.....how about this?!
1 It does appear W&W not universally popular (though many ok to live with it) - it does convey passivity and so perhaps has wrong feel (to use and also to wider community) - we are active about it, as regular monitoring/discussion. Observing air traffic is not called Watch and Wait for obvious reasons!
2 Change will only happen if we start it - let's do it! There is probably patient demand
3 Some alternatives in above discussion, all with pros and cons - but what do we want to convey? Probably a sense of activeness (we/docs are in control and making decisions), not just sitting around - and this activeness needs to be clear to a wider community (dentists, GPs, even dare I say it travel insurance community etc). At the same time, we want to down-play alarm factor.....
4 Perhaps a poll here (again unrepresentative...) and discussion/vote(poll) at Barts meeting (I won't be there unfortunately)
Of all the suggestions above, I do like the Active Care. Has no bad surveillance feeling and encompasses both W&W and treatment phases. So does it cover everything? Perhaps Active Management is even better, as does the care word imply treatment too much....?
Sorry to ask the question but is there a difference between W&W pre and post treatment? my partner never experienced the W&W pre-treatment stage and it has always seemed a bit strange to say you are on W&W post chemo and Active Care would fit here (as is a constant round of consultant appts etc). Could you have something like active monitoring pre treatment and active care post treatment?
I think that W&W describes things from the Consultants point of view which is fair enough, but we have to adapt our lifestyle and be pro active to the reality of having a compromised immune system ,of illness and fatigue and the constant risk of infection etc.
Watch and Wait - sum up the consultants role in the journey but the uncertainty and what we are waiting for is not thar reasuring. Watchful waiting has more of a sense of action - but not brilliant. Adding active is a positive but don't see a cctv camera anywhere. Immie's suggestion of active care would work for any stage whether pre /during or post but not useful to medics just because it is too general.
W&W does sum up the pre treatetment situation well enough and probably will persist. We need to learn to live with it just like the sll/cll itself. The important thing is that the consultant is active when the time is right for us as individuals. We need to play an active part by telling it as it really is, how tired etc, rather than hiding symptoms because we are trying to be stoic. Should the time come where we need treatment we need to be reasonably fit to tolerate the current gold standard FCR. How quickly the new options will become available is unclear. So whatever the label we need to be active physically and mentally ensuring we are honest with our consultants so they can correctly access the need for treatment should our journey require it.
I guess it depends on who's doing the watching and waiting! Does a clinician watch and wait between reading your notes ahead of a visit? I guess we do that?
Whilst we are all familiar and happy ourselves with W+W I think it sends out a confusing message, and one that makes people think CLL is not important / significant.
So I think change would be a good idea.
Please keep posting ideas, then a Poll would be the next move.
Ernest (I've been told I can be the "slowest CLL-AMC patient in the west" . . . )
Ernie ............. "slowest CLL-AMC patient in the west"
If by slowest ... you mean mobility ... we'll have to have a ' run ' off.
Up until a couple of years ago, I used to go hill walking 2 - 3 times a day ... but since the pain started, and I have had to go Oww ! with ever step I take, I get overtaken by ... ( My ol dad in his eighties - guy's on crutches - wee girlies pushing prams - you name it everything overtakes me ) .... and to make matters worse ..... I get fatigued !!! ..........
..... then again ..... Ernie - "slowest CLL-AMC patient in the west" would make a good title for a song.
No no no - it's all a mistake - I am happily married
PM(message) me anyone and I'll explain why I chose my tag from "Ernest" (no connection with the song)
If anyone can re-write all the song lyrics for a CLL patient though, that would be great.
I've known several people that sing the song, but was fortunately far far too young to ever watch Mr Hill.
For the slowness, that is probably my thinking. Physically I can still run 10 yards at a reasonable pace, or walk a couple of miles, but then need several days off afterwards. . . . It's hard to get my head round that.
Good ideas on the W + W renaming - I'll post below
Below is one, and there is another just specifically for those with CLL, I'll try and find it again...
Dick
Poetically Inspired by the Emperor of all Maladies
September 30, 2013 | Brian Brewer
I was attending a lovely evening of music and poetry a few weeks back. In between sets of music and performance art, a man named Ed Luhrs took the stage and what he was about to read completely took me by surprise. He began by talking about The Emperor of All Maladies, a best-selling compendium of the history of cancer and cancer treatment. The book had moved Ed so much that he was inspired to write a poem based on it. After he recited it, I approached him and asked him if it was okay to publish it here on the CRI blog. He said it was. So, published in its entirety, is Ed's poem.
Very interesting discussion. "Watch and Wait" definitely comes across as too passive and "Active Surveillance" or "Active Management and Care" are improvements.
I was interested to note that the New South Wales Rural Fire Service (the world's largest volunteer fire service) and recently in the news:
A fire has started. There is no immediate danger. Stay up to date in case the situation changes.
Watch and Act
"There is a heightened level of threat. Conditions are changing and you need to start taking action now to protect you and your family."
Emergency Warning
An Emergency Warning is the highest level of Bush Fire Alert. You may be in danger and need to take action immediately. Any delay now puts your life at risk.
Like many others I feel the term watch and wait is too passive and makes me feel that I have no control at all. I prefer the term Active Management and Care as I think it might be more readily understood by those who do not have much knowledge of the condition. When told that I have CLL they think that because I am not receiving treatment that I have a minor condition and that any symptoms such as fatigue etc are therefore not serious and can be discounted. AMC is a better description of this stage of the condition.
So far, I prefer 'Active Management'. We'd have to use these words and not the abbreviation, in describing our present situation to others and so I think that to add the word 'Care' would make it too long and also has many different connotations, which again might influence how others perceive us and our condition while we are not in treatment.
I need to get out the Thesaurus ........ and get a life!!
Personally, I like the term 'active monitoring', as in my opinion it implies that things are being done to monitor disease progress (or, hopefully, lack of progress), and it sounds more upbeat and positive than w&w. I actually have used the AM term to family and friends, as I found they were completely bewildered when I said w&w. The AM term seems to give people more confidence that I am being cared for.
Totally agree with your comment. Watch & Wait from the viewpoint of the consultant haematologists we visit is maybe appropriate, but it in no way describes having to deal with the ' can of worms ' that arise, due to having to manage a compromised immune system.
Having to deal with being on benefits, W&W implies to officialdom that as long as you are on W&W, that CLL has no impact on your health.
Active Management/Care as you say does sound more upbeat and positive, and empowers family and friends etc that they can more easily be involved with you, as opposed to the closed door of W&W.
You said it ygtgo - we have to "manage a compromised immune system".
That involves so much more than Watching and Waiting, even more than Monitoring, which still seems to minimise what we actually do, as others assume that 'to keep an eye on things' is all that is required, when we all know, we have to do so much more.
At the moment, I still like Active Management, as it is not passive at all but I keep an open mind........
Yes, I would be happy with using either active management or active monitoring, do you think there will be a poll on this? I am new to this site (although was diagnosed nearly 3 years ago) and not sure yet what influence the CLLSA has?
I'm sorry you have CLL but very glad that you have joined the site.
I think it is possible for the CLLSA to have influence and we are definitely a stronger force, whilst acting together, than we are alone....strength in numbers, as they say!
You say you were dx nearly 3 years ago and have been using the term AM, when speaking to others about your CLL. This is quite progressive really and if through discussions here, more of us can begin to change the way in which we talk about our CLL, then we might effect change for the future. It's a start anyway........
We are a friendly bunch here, so please feel free to ask about anything and if you want to just talk about how things are for you, then this is a good place also to do that.
I chose my name to reflect that i do feel happy these days as, since my dx, my disease progress seems to have been slower than expected, although in the early days an almost simultaneous dx of a melanoma and then CLL shook my world quite badly.
Nearly three years on, I notice that i am getting tired very easily and I seem to frequently fall foul of petty infections that drag on for ages. All of these are a nuisance, but on the whole I am feeling better than I thought I would by now, and I feel very positive that new drug trials and a better understanding of all cancers will greatly improve my chances IF and when things start to 'kick off'. I am optimistic! x
I thought it was watch and wait between appointments, until my consultant said last time that I should be checking myself for changes between appointments. I find it hard, as I find it hard to take my own pulse, to feel for change in lumps in my neck. They are there, are they bigger or not?
I think your Consultant is meaning to monitor any changes to your general health Barbarann such as increasing fatigue, any night sweats, more infections, pain or tenderness in any areas etc.
They'd be no expectation of taking pulses etc. unless you have a b/p machine that also takes your pulse but sometimes an increase in Lump size can be more obvious.
Wow, thank you for such a quick response, Newdawn. That is helpful. I didn't mean literally taking my pulse, but that clarifies what he wants to know next time I see him.
Personally I don't mind W&W, although I can see how it can cause problems, because in truth I don't now whether I have a serious problem or not? I get the feeling from my initial discussions with the doctor's that they don't see me needing treatment anytime soon, because it's been suggested that after my next bloods in 6 months, they'll likely become annual until I feel I'm starting to show other symptoms. The truth is though until I have the next set of bloods I don't know whether they are right or wrong, but until then I'll be doing everything I can to try & keep my count low & trying to avoid getting too many other symptoms, by staying as fit as possible & taking a Green supplement, so from that point of view you could say I'm trying to proactively manage my condition.
This thread seems rather old. In the US "Watchful Waiting" for low-grade non-aggressive prostate cancer has been replaced by "Active Surveillance". I have Gleason 6 PcA and have been on Active Objectified Surveillance since diagnosis in December of 2006 at 59 years of age. Last PSA in February 2016 is 0.9.
You are right... 'Watch and Wait' or 'Watch me loose Weight' as I referred to it, is being replaced now in CLL by "Active Surveillance", I'm seeing it much more frequently in research papers, and on websites.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.