My consultant phoned me yesterday, to say he had reviewed my recent ultra sound and was concerned that the left lobe of my liver had shrunk since Oct 2016 and since March 2017, despite me having abstained from alcohol. He asked me if I could have an MRI scan rather than the Fibroscan he originally planned. He asked if I would be ok with that, fine I said no problems. Not sure what MRI shows which other tests don't, but a good example of just making sure a patient is happy with a phone call, rather than the expense of getting an appointment set up, posting out a letter and the patient saying, I can't do that because of the various reasons an MRI scan is not appropriate. Still aching all over, but otherwise good. Pleased I have not cashed in the prescription for codeine, don't suppose they will do my liver any good.
MRI scan on the way: My consultant... - British Liver Trust
MRI scan on the way
A fibroscan only measures the elasticity of the liver and will give them a general idea of whether the liver is scarred or not, but as I understand it, inflammation can give a different picture, so not always accurate. in addition, for a fibroscan result to be useful, they do need to know what condition you have as the scale is different for each type of hepatitis.
An MRI, takes a look at your liver (or wherever else they choose) slice by slice as it were and so gives a greater degree of accuracy. They will be able to tell more from these images regarding nodules forming or blockages in the veins etc. I'm afraid I can't be more precise as I only had one done once and they were looking to rule out certain conditions, but in the end didn't really need the images from the scan to confirm this. Someone else should be able to give you a greater picture.
As for the codeine, you will need to discuss with your GP/consultant, the length of time that it is suitable to take this type of med for as I know I can't take them indefinitely, so better to be safe than sorry.
All the very best,