Angiogram or CT : Is it best to have an... - British Heart Fou...

British Heart Foundation

52,336 members32,997 posts

Angiogram or CT

Caseyangel profile image
13 Replies

Is it best to have an angiogram to check for blockages, but as they are inserting stents if needed, would I be better having a CT first to check for blockages

Written by
Caseyangel profile image
Caseyangel
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
13 Replies
MichaelJH profile image
MichaelJHHeart Star

I think you are best guided by your cardiologist as you have multiple heart conditions which may affect the route map!

Caseyangel profile image
Caseyangel in reply to MichaelJH

You're probably right. Seeing the Cardiology nurse for a pre-assessment so I could clarify then. Thank you

MichaelJH profile image
MichaelJHHeart Star in reply to Caseyangel

With an angiogram they check for blockages and, usually, stent if appropriate. Each procedure carries a very small amount of risk. Both have a risk of mainly kidney damage or allergic reaction to the dye used, and entering via an artery for an angiogram.

Caseyangel profile image
Caseyangel in reply to MichaelJH

I know but the nurse they won't be fitting the stent on the same so I wondered if to go for the CT scan first, but I'll ask the nurse. It's all a bit scary isn't it and all new to me. X

Caseyangel profile image
Caseyangel

It all started with me feeling dizzy in March which led to blood tests, ecg and then a 24-hr ecg, then an echocardiogram which showed the severe pump impairment with an EF of 30-35%, very tired all the time. I ended up seeing a private doctor because they said I'd have to wait until September but felt so unwell and I'm the main carer for my son who is disabled so didn't want to wait. But I'm now in the NHS system following the echo as it was felt more urgent. It's very scary isn't it. Glad it made you feel much better, and you carry on feeling much better. X

Caseyangel profile image
Caseyangel

Thank you, I hope so too x

Cardiac CT scans are of limited usage. Whilst they will show obvious blockages of major arteries and give an indication of the flow to the heart as a whole, they cannot show how blood is passing through the small artery branches.

Also, at an angiogram, they can insert devices along the wire that use ultrasound that can give your cardiologist an indication of the condition of the artery wall and they can even now use a tiny camera head on the wire during the Angiogram to actually see what is happening particularly if they decide to use one of the stimulants to induce a heart rate increase. All in all, the cardiologist will do what is right for you it’s not a case of a CT will produce the same results as it doesn’t 😀

dunestar profile image
dunestar in reply to

Angiogram isn't sufficiently high resolution to indicate what's going on at the micro vessel level either. That's why diagnosis of coronary microvascular disease is so difficult.

Boharford profile image
Boharford

I had a CT angio to hurry the process up as a long wait fo angiography. Consult said it wasn't clear on CT and I still had to wait for an angiography - 4 and half months

siouxbee19 profile image
siouxbee19

Exactly what BarneysDad said is what I was going to say...best of luck to you & be well!

Surreychica_1 profile image
Surreychica_1

I had an angiocram the week before I had another to put in the stents. Reason for that was because they didnt have a bed for me at that particular time. It was painless and all very interesting. Last week I had the angiocram but I had to be admitted which took hours and then the next day I had the angiocram and stent fitted, they then kept me on a monitor for 14 hours which checked my heart and circulation and then they took it off at about 10.30pm. I was released the next day at about 3pm after blood tests had been taken. Putting in the stent took less the an hour and it was mostly painless except a few funny feelings in the heart at times and also a hot feeling in my hand. Good luck with that. I was over the moon when I had mine, just trying to get back into my sleep rhythm as I spent months and months terrified to go to sleep in case I had a heart attack!!

Zac11 profile image
Zac11

I too had a CT scan first that indicated a slight blockage. Now booked in for an angiogram and stent if needed, but 12 weeks to wait.

Tab1966 profile image
Tab1966

Personally, I'd go straight for the angiogram. As my consultant calls it, it's the "gold standard". Additionally, I had a false negative result on a CT Angio giving a clear result, when in fact all 3 of my coronary arteries were restricted, resulting in 5 stents!

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

New Recent Life Update

Woke up Friday as normal hubby got up at 10.45am and went to bathroom 11.07am he rang the bell (I...

It's hard right now

Five weeks ago I had a triple bypass. I was discharged after a week in hospital. When I was...

Extending My Guinness World Record

My story is on here somewhere I am The Longest Surviving Triple Heart Bypass Patient in the...

What should I expect one year post NSTEMI

It’s coming up to a year from my event and stenting, I haven’t seen my GP or a cardiologist since...

Bisoprolol side effects

Hi all I've had paroxysmal fibrillation for a year now and 6 weeks ago put on low dose 1.25mg...