Alternatives to Statins: Ezetimibe is a... - British Heart Fou...

British Heart Foundation

49,974 members31,556 posts

Alternatives to Statins

seasider18 profile image
13 Replies

Ezetimibe is a tablet that lowers cholesterol. It may be prescribed if statins cannot be taken, or alongside a statin for extra cholesterol-lowering. It’s a ‘cholesterol absorption inhibitor’ that limits the absorption of cholesterol in the small intestine. As a result, less cholesterol is taken to the liver, which therefore increases its efforts to take more cholesterol out of the blood.

Ezetimibe is not as effective as most statins but will reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or ‘bad cholesterol’ by 15 to 22 per cent. It can reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes when taken alongside a statin, but we have little evidence it can do this if used on its own. Side effects can include stomach pain, diarrhoea, flatulence and tiredness. It’s not recommended for people with significant liver disease or women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

PCSK9 inhibitors This new class of drugs is very effective in lowering cholesterol and in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in high-risk patients. Studies indicate they can lower LDL cholesterol by 50 to 60 per cent. Cholesterol levels will typically drop significantly after around four weeks of treatment, and then remain at this lower level. The reduction in cholesterol is even greater when taken alongside a statin. Two have been licensed so far: alirocumab (Praluent) and evolocumab (Repatha). They work by blocking a protein called PCSK9, which binds to LDL receptors in the liver, stopping them from working. These receptors normally remove cholesterol from the blood, but by blocking this protein, more LDL receptors will be available to remove cholesterol from the blood. In June 2016, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended PCSK9 inhibitors for those who have had a heart attack or stroke, or who have FH. They are expensive and so currently are only recommended for people in these groups who can’t get their cholesterol levels low enough by taking statins, or who are intolerant to statins. PCSK9 inhibitors have to be given as injections every two or four weeks. There appear to be few side effects, but these may include flu-like symptoms or soreness around the injection site.

Apheresis

LDL apheresis is a treatment that removes LDL cholesterol from your blood. It works a lot like dialysis. Your blood is removed via a needle in your arm. The blood goes through a tube and enters a special filter called a plasma separator, which separates the blood and removes the cholesterol. The cholesterol-filtered blood is then returned to your body.

Because it’s an invasive and expensive treatment, it’s only used for people who are at very high risk because of their cholesterol levels. This means people with FH who have inherited two copies of the faulty gene (homozygous FH) from the age of seven onwards.

Having two copies of an FH gene means you have a severe form of FH and your cholesterol levels will be exceptionally high without treatment.

LDL apheresis may occasionally be used for other patients who have just one copy of the faulty gene (heterozygous FH), for people with a strong family history of premature death from coronary heart disease, or if they have worsening coronary heart disease and their cholesterol remains high when everything else has been tried.

This treatment can lower your LDL cholesterol by 60 to 75 per cent. However, it does rise again quite quickly, which is why treatment is repeated every one or two weeks. Each treatment takes two to four hours. The main side effect is tiredness. This is very mild and tends to improve with future treatments.

Written by
seasider18 profile image
seasider18
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
13 Replies
Dmactds profile image
Dmactds

Also might consider, Nicotinic Acid (as I've mentioned here before), brand name (no prescription needed) "Slo Niacin", 2 or 3 pills a day brought my cholesterol outrageously under control and blew my doc's mind. Except for short term 'blushing' when first beginning the pills, there's no adverse side effects at least with me.

Warning !! Just about any doc you ask will PooPoo this treatment not because it's unhealthy, which it isn't, but because it's not one of their "official" more expensive medical prescriptions.

Paul12 profile image
Paul12 in reply to Dmactds

Difficult to know right dosage- 15mg, 50mg? Etc as you cannot test cholesterol all the time...

Dmactds profile image
Dmactds in reply to Paul12

I tried to make clear in my previous post that Slo Niacin is basically harmless except as a cholesterol deterrent and that I take 2 to 3 pills a day, it doesn't matter, but one a day has no effect on cholesterol. I'm not going to get into a big 'To Do' about this; just offered it as a bit of personal experience; have no interest in dealing with doubting Thomasinas.....

Paul12 profile image
Paul12 in reply to Dmactds

That seems an unnecessarily hostile post to a simple comment. I was simply wondering what level to start at - pills have different strengths.

Dmactds profile image
Dmactds in reply to Paul12

No hostility at all...,sorry you see it as such. I've given you a decent dosage suggestion, what more is needed I have no idea.

Paul12 profile image
Paul12 in reply to Dmactds

As said, pill strength varies. So 2-3 pills is meaningless. I was simply wondering what strength. Anyway, it doesn’t matter

seasider18 profile image
seasider18 in reply to Dmactds

I used to take nicotinic acid many years ago but so long ago I can't remember what for though it was prescribed by my then doctor who was very old school.

Paul12 profile image
Paul12

Lifestyle is an alternative to statins - been around for longer and has positive side effects

Adaboo profile image
Adaboo

The whole cholesterol myth has been thoroughly debunked now in so many studies I wouldn’t know where to start. We all need to note triglycerides and Lpa in blood tests, not HDL and LDL. The most scary things I have read in these studies is that those who had lowest cholesterol died first. 😱

seasider18 profile image
seasider18 in reply to Adaboo

When I was first prescribed a statin in 2011 my GP was also taking one. I stopped and started due to muscle pain and eventually gave up. My wife's last to blood tests suggested she should be taking one. The doctor pointed to an instruction he had put on his wall with the latest advice that was tell the patients the pros and cons and let them make their own decision. My wife again said 'No thanks' I asked the doctor who has a family history of high cholesterol if he still took them. I was rather surprised when he said he no longer took them but did not ask him why as my time had run out.

Chappychap profile image
Chappychap

"Slo Niacin is basically harmless"

I'm not sure I agree with that. Although it's practically impossible to overdose on Niacin by eating Niacin rich natural foods, it is possible to overdose on Niacin supplement tablets, when the symptoms can include gout, palpitations, fainting, stomach cramps and vomiting. Furthermore excessive Niacin has been linked to liver damage and strokes.

I'm not anti Niacin, I'm just saying eating them willy nilly might not be a smart plan.

sos007 profile image
sos007 in reply to Chappychap

I have been taking 500 mg of regular niacin for 4 years following triple bypass surgery.

The noted side-effects are rare, especially if taken with food and a glass of cold water (other than the niacin flush which is harmless). To overdose on niacin would require you to take more than 8 grams (8,000 mg) which is what some people with mental health conditions take.

Although Niacin increases uric acid which may trigger gout - this is only likely if your diet is already high in sugar, processed foods or alcohol. My uric acid (tested quarterly) is well within the optimal range.

Dietary and lifestyle change are the best solution to normalizing cholesterol levels, especially the more important LDL-P (particle number). The LDL-C (mass) which is what is normally measured by doctors, is less important than LDL-P (measured with an NMR Lipoprofile blood test).

Good luck to all.

Thanks for the info ! It's very kind of you. I'd like to look into the Ezetimibe tablet.

However, I don't like the sound of the LDL apheresis . I was going to be on one of those machines. I was in the waiting room. The receptionist told me not to do it as people had contracted A.I.D.S , when the machine wasn't cleaned properly . ( It was long after when A.I.D.S had been discovered) . So I did not go ahead and I left.

I am not advising others not to go ahead with the treatment . Everyone makes their own choices , and that was mine.

You may also like...

Inclisiran, an alternative to statins.

unstable angina or stroke. It will only be given when treatment with statins has not helped lower...

Alternative to Statins?

seeing as there's been one or two posts mentioning cholesterol and statins. I'll leave you to...

Statin issues- advice on alternatives.

Response Missing from \"Alternative to Statins?\"Question

experience with statins and I thought it would have. been very useful to the person who posted the...

Advice re Statins

54 LDL Cholesterol 2.47 Non-HDL Cholesterol 3.1 HDL Cholesterol 1.44 Total Cholesterol: HDL...