Hi, I had a CA back in May and was admitted for emergency treatment. During recovery when the cardiologist came to discuss what had happened he said I had two stents and damage to the left side of the heart but also there was a blocked artery on the right hand side which they didn't treat at the time but would review later. Six months later I'm still struggling with breathlessness on hills and stairs, they gave me a stress echo and have now said that unblocking the right artery may improve things though the breathlessness may also be down to the damage to the left side. It doesnt sound like a straight forward angioplasty as he said they need to enter through wrist and groin to approach the blockage from both directions and the operation would take about two hours. The situation I'm now in is having to decide if I want to have it done and take the obvious risks involved with the procedure in the knowledge that there may not be any, or only slight improvement?
I appreciate that in the end only I can make the decision but just wondering if anyone has had a similar situation. My gut feeling is I'm lucky to still be here so do I need to push it again with another risky procedure which may not bring any benefit?..I'm finding it a tough call