Hey guys as you may remember my CT scan showed severe stenosis. I’m waiting to see consultant to arrange an angiogram. I’m the meantime I’ve received a letter with results of an echo. They say I show no valve disease and just mild annual calcification. So is the CT wrong?? Confused right now
Confused : Hey guys as you may remember... - British Heart Fou...
Confused
Written by
jojo250274
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
2 Replies
•
Hi Jojo. I think they look at the heart in different ways. If the CT has shown severe stenosis and the cardiologist wants an angiogram you should go with it. 12 months before my heart attack my echocardiogram showed ‘boringly normal function ‘ according to the technician. The angiogram following the heart attack showed several blockages from 70 to 90%. However because the blood flow was getting through the vessels it didn’t show detailed pictures of the inside of the vessels which is what an angiogram does. Hope this helps. Hopefully your angiogram will give you answers for clarity. Take care and keep us posted. Zena
Not what you're looking for?
You may also like...
confused
results got a letter today to now go for heart ct scan does this mean something is wrong as I...
confused
people’s rehab as it’s less intense. i’m not agist so don’t take this the wrong way but i think...
Confused
breathing.. I’m not getting excessively out of breath but enough that effects me when I’m talking....
Stressed and Confused
looked at in more detail.
I had a Calcium CT scan which was mildly raised then everything got put...
Confused by what’s happened (54)
first post. I’m 54 and last Tuesday was admitted to A&E with a mild heart attack. (Does mild make...