Is saliva testing better? Five things... - Lung Conditions C...

Lung Conditions Community Forum

55,839 members66,495 posts

Is saliva testing better? Five things to know about the new COVID-19 test.

2greys profile image
4 Replies

Early in the pandemic, it became clear that testing for COVID-19 might be key to controlling outbreaks. But the existing tests have presented logistical challenges. Health officials have been clamoring for a cheaper, easier, and quicker test that would boost the country’s testing capability, which is needed to paint a more accurate picture of the virus’s spread. Patients who test positive could be notified sooner. And quicker implementation of measures to prevent the spread, such as quarantines, could slow transmission rates.

Early research has suggested that a saliva test may be a step in the right direction—and now the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given emergency use authorization (EUA) to SalivaDirect, a diagnostic test method created by Yale researchers. (The laboratory development and validation of SalivaDirect was performed by Chantal Vogels, PhD, a Yale School of Public Health postdoctoral fellow, and Doug Brackney, PhD, adjunct assistant clinical professor.)

One of the benefits of SalivaDirect is its simple design. Basically, a patient spits into any sterilized container—a special vial is not needed—and hands the sample over to a medical professional. The sample is then sent to a lab for processing.

yalemedicine.org/stories/5-...

Written by
2greys profile image
2greys
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
4 Replies
SORRELHIPPO profile image
SORRELHIPPO

This looks helpful, especially if it turns out to be over 90% accurate, I am concerned about the false negatives, when these allow people back into a full social life. If results are only 75% accurate, will cause quite a lot of problems.

watergazer profile image
watergazer

I suppose it's like all new disease- it will take a while to find a test that will get really accurate results x

2greys profile image
2greys in reply to watergazer

That may possibly never happen. We could run out of time.

Coronavirus pandemic could be over within two years - WHO head:

bbc.co.uk/news/world-53870798

HungryHufflepuff profile image
HungryHufflepuff in reply to 2greys

The next story on the BBC says the virus may never be over 🙄 Good old BBC impartiality.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Cystic fibrosis

HiI was diagnosed with bronchiectasis at the beginning of the year, at the time it was mentioned i...

anyone having croaky throat problems with inhalers

i’m currently using Trimbow inhaler for COPD and unfortunately, I seem to be one in 10 people...

Blood thinners advice

Morning friends, on Thursday I had a third tachycardia episode - with the previous two my heart...

abit nervous 😕

just a quick check in to see how everyone is . . . . . Well the time as come for my disabled son...

Hello from Chom 🐕

Chom turned 9 on June 17th. He was adopted from a shelter when he was just one. Abandoned in a...