I had AF back in 2016, fixed with a CV in 2017. Then it returned a year ago march 24., both occasions triggered by chest infection/pneumonia.
This is permanent not paroxysmal, just a slightly fast irregular heartbeat, controlled with BBs + thinners.
After my CV in 2017, I was taken off BBs, and eventually Apixaban too, tho only after I pushed for it, and the cardiologist had me on 24 hr monitor + echocardiogram first.
This time around I'm now in regular rhythm after a PFA end Dec 24, and should be getting a call from the cardio team soon, after having an echocardiogram a couple weeks back. I am resigned to being on Riveroxiban forever, as I'm coming up 74 and have had AF twice. That's fine.
But I really want to come off BBs, which keep my heart rate a bit low (50ish at rest) and, I think, prevent it going high enough to help with exercise (I cycle). In addition, I'm a lifelong asthmatic, (so BBs not recommended) and tho Bisprolol is supposedly cardio specific, I'm not so sure. But my brief post op talk with the team suggested they might want me staying on BBs long term.
What experience have others had with cardiologists keeping them on BBs after restoration of normal rhythm? I know it will depend somewhat on how the heart has responded to PFA, ie, has the ventricle returned to normal size? But assuming it has, what reasons might cardios have to keep me on BBs ?