Has anyone done some research or given some thought to 1.why ablations haven't (yet) shown to increase mortality and 2. what the small ganglia that are probably destroyed during P.V.I are involved in?
Thank you for your consideration
A couple of questions from a curious ... - Atrial Fibrillati...
A couple of questions from a curious mind
Written by
approaching
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
30 Replies
•
Hi app
.......why ablations haven't (yet) shown to increase mortality.......
I think ablations are more about QOL rather than mortality. However if they work, and the heart functions properly, I would assume this could lead to a better mortality rate. Maybe the Jury is still on that one - treatment for afib tends to be about QOL though from my experience. To answer your question directly - afib is unlikely to kill you hence the mortality will be the same - unless you are unaware you have it and suffer a stroke. If AF is picked up by a doctor then there are treatments to help with this. Everyone on this forum knows they have it - they are unlikely to have joined otherwise. We are the lucky ones - plenty of people are walking about with afib and have no idea at all.
........what the small ganglia that are probably destroyed during P.V.I are involved in?........
I`ll be dammed if I know heheh.
Seriously though it`s pretty hard to understand but try......
sciencedirect.com/topics/me...
Have a great day.
Best,
Paul
Thank you for your reply Paul.
I meant to say decrease (not increase)in mortality rate, which you kindly understood anyway.
I find it strange that the risk of sudden death from stroke doesn't change after successful ablation. Perhaps the jury is still out though. The anticoagulents only decrease it by 60% from what i gather, as they introduce the risk of a bleed.
Thank you for that article of the ganglia, some suggestion of a localised feedback role, i will have a good read. Peter
Good morning Peter - I always assumed that after an ablation the stoke risk disappeared - it was from this forum that I learnt this is not the case. I was quite shocked as I thought that a successful ablation would be the end of it. This is not the case and many still continue with anticoagulants after the procedure.
When I have the time I`ll do a little research about the role of the ganglia. I like to learn as much as I can about afib which is why I check the forum everyday. Knowledge is power as they say - certainly the case with a medical condition. It`s good when you can discuss things with your cardio and throw a few things in the pot. Certainly new treatments or developments and potential problems with existing ones. They don`t always tell you about these things so it`s good to keep them 'on their toes' 
If I find out anything interesting I`ll post back.
Best,
Paul
• in reply toPaulbounce
yes, it's not the AF that causes the stroke, but the company it keeps, high blood pressure, age, diabetes etc etc
Hi , It seems PVI can raise the left atrial pressure ( the ablation causes some stiffening) which in turn has the atrial appendage balloon out and that is where 90% of non-valvular clots come from, perhaps that is partly why there is no clear reduction in mortality.
The newer technique of FIRm ablation is a point to point to another point ablation ( not a line ablation, targaeting aberrant areas, and may reduce the scaring shrinkage and the LAappenage ballooning out.
interesting
Peter
Taking the question - does ablation reduce mortality, which I think is what you wanted to say, I believe there is some effect.
AF can lead to strokes which can kill you, but a less recognised impact is that AF can also lead to heart failure, and that can also kill you. Ablations reduce the heart rate and this should reduce heart failure and hence mortality.
For more info, read:
ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161...
One graph is particularly interesting which shows mortality in a section of the Minnesota population. After 10 years, 60% of Non AF sufferers are still alive compared with only about 35% of AF sufferers, a lot of this is down to heart failure. It mentions that ablations are considered to reduce mortality.
Very interesting link. I've skipped though it but want to read it in detail when time allows.
I think it confirms what I say about the 60 - 100 HR being seen as 'normal'. A resting heart rate of 90 - 100 is to high IMHO. That`s just my point of view but lower is better as far as I am concerned.
Since my CV my HR is about 60 at rest. Before it was around 90 -100 at rest (still within the safe zone). The reduced rate must be better for heart health ?
Best,
Paul
Thank you for taking the time to reply.
Yes meant to say reduce mortality..
Am pretty sure my cardiologist said that successful ablation hasn't been show to reduce mortality. I will look into it more.
Peter
Yes the standard response is that an ablation does not reduce mortality. However from the papers I've read, I think there is a positive benefit from successful ablations, though not enough to bring the risk down to that of non-afibbers. So I've had a successful ablation and I think my risk of a stroke has reduced because of that, but I still take warfarin.
You may find this recent article interesting
nature.com/articles/s41598-...
It is refering to how the left atrial appendage balloons out after atrial ablation.
Peter
Yes that's very interesting. It raises concerns about the enlargement of the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) after RF ablation. My take is that it's not such a bad thing if the LAA volume increases as that might stop blood pooling. The LAA blood velocity also increased by about 20% which again should reduce pooling and clotting. However I think it all needs a lot more research.
Thank you for your reply.
Have you had an ablation?
Peter
Yes, I had one 10 years ago. Successful (other than very occasional short runs).
Mark
Do you know what type of ablation was performed on you Mark?
Peter
It was a combined cryo and RF. So cryo for 3 of the PVs. The 4th was too big so that was RF. Then RF for some other areas such as the ligament of marshal. My EP is probably the number one in the UK.
So you would have had less shrinkage and scaring than a PVI with posterior wall isolation, but risked pulmonary vein stenosis , i think
Yes, the cryo balloon would have gone in too far and risked PV stenosis. Fortunately he had the RF option otherwise less experienced doctors might have risked it if they had cryo only. In my view, PV stenosis is more common than currently understood for cryo. A lot of doctors underplay it but it can be very serious.
How bad was your Afib before the ablation?
I had AF for one day in three, but that increased to near 70-80% by the time of my ablation. Moderately symptomatic.
Yes, pulmonary vein stenosis would be a tough diagnosis to take.
Have you been on anticoagulants these past 10 years Mark?
Yes every day for the last 10 years on warfarin
If A Fib (generally) does not kill you so why would stopping afib make you live longer?
I meant to say reduce mortality .
having afib and being on warforin comes with an increased mortality, i think metadata says those on warforin live 10 years less than those who are not, for example.
I had not understood that warfarin reduces your life by 10 years! If that is the case why take it? The potential upsde is offset by the downside surely? Especially if you only think you have 10 years left!
I am not medically trained , however and for what it is worth:, I think the issue you are trying to address is that having afib increases your risk of stroke , but having an ablation reduces or eliminates the afib, but has not been proved to reduce the risk of stroke or death. So ablations improve QAL but do not increase the length of your life?
Well its still worth having the ablation for QAL. That is really what all AFIB treatment is about.
Yes, you have it in a nutshell really.
there is just so much going on in the heart system and being a closed circuit changing something from the outside has reactionary effects i guess. It sure improves the immediate QOL, no question.
The metadata also said the being on an antipsychotic reduces your life by 20 years!
I better keep off those then! My father was the longest lived male member of our family and he made 79. I am already 59!!
Thats funny.
Now its probably an associative link rather than a causative link, that is if you get a diagnosis that requires them them you already have problems,
Not what you're looking for?
You may also like...
A couple of questions..
Hi everyone, a few days back when I logged on there was a post from somebody about...
A few questions
I’ve been an afibber since May, happened in Spain on holiday. On tablets and have had a couple if...
Couple questions if anyone can help.
I have high blood pressure, can anyone tell me the right way this is taking right arm or left arm ,...
The Power of the Mind
Last week I was due to go and see my EP 30 miles away. I'd been feeling so well and thought I don't...
Is it safe to have a couple of glasses of wine?
Hi everyone, I was diagnosed last year with Afib, my highest reading being 170 beats per minute.
I...
Bored out of my mind!
Recovering from a Pacemaker 
From a friend. 
A few dumb questions
Planning a healthy recovery from ablation 
