Had a brisk walk felt fine unbelievable high rate that is definitely incorrect.
Fit bit peak: Had a brisk walk felt... - Atrial Fibrillati...
Fit bit peak
I’ve had readings like that too. I know I’ve been in AF on a walk as I’ve felt it but if my heart really was going as fast as the Fitbit says I’d be breathless and unable to walk at the pace I do.
Fit Bit is a fun thing but totally unreliable for heart rate reliability. Have a Polar heart rate monitor which is pretty reliable
I agree with your recommendation for Polar HRMs particularly for people with AF, and that was confirmed by a specialist cardiac nurse. I currently have a Polar Vanguard V and H10 chest strap and they have no problem in measuring my heart rate at > 200 bpm if I'm not keeping an eye on my heart rate so that I can reduce effort.
Hi
Is the accuracy in AF, dependent on the H10 or the watch? I am in permanent AF and use a concept rower at the gym and static bike at home. I just need a basic watch that is affordable but still accurate in AF when exercising. Your Vanguard V is higher spec than I need.
Can you recommend an AF reliable basic set up from Polar for those of us less athletic than yourself. Thanks.
That depends whether the Concept 2 has a PM3 or a PM5 monitor. For years I used a Polar RS400 HRM with a Polar coded chest strap and later a Polar T31 Wearlink chest strap on the gym Polar compatible equipment. The gym Concept 2 used a PM3 monitor that I set up to show heart rate, but in in every session the heart rate would disappear from the PM3 and reappear after a short break. I bought a Concept 2 with a PM3 for home use, and the same drop outs occurred with a Polar M200 and an H10 chest strap, and later with the Polar Vanguard V and H10 chest strap. After several emails with Concept 2 Support, we concluded that the PM3 was reading the AF as bad data, dropping out for 5 seconds and reinitialising; this wasn't helped by the very quick processing by the Vanguard V and H10. By the way, the H10 can simultaneously transmit Bluetooth Smart and Gymlink so it should be OK for the gym equipment (some gym equipment uses ANT+ that is not compatible). I took out the PM3 on my home Concept 2 and installed a PM5, and I've never had another drop out.
I must explain that Amazon sent me the Polar Vanguard V to test and review. The Vanguard V is an excellent HRM but I cannot use the Orthostatic Test as my arrhythmia disturbs the r-r interval so the test returns an error.
To summarise, a Polar HRM with a chest strap will probably suffice for a static bike; however, if the Concept 2 has a PM3 and you are using heart rate indication you are likely to get drop outs. The recording on the Polar HRM shouldn't be affected. If the PM only accepts a smart card it is not a PM5; the PM number will be on the facia. If the gym Concept 2 doesn't have a PM5 you can always look at your HRM.
I should also add that the Polar Vanguard V and H10 chest strap are said by Polar to be their most accurate. The H10 can record a session without an HRM and can be downloaded via Polar apps later. The Vanguard V uses wrist skin sensors, but the combination of my wrists flexing during rowing and AF requires a paired chest strap.
Thank you. That is extremely helpful.
My pleasure! Please come back if there's anything that I can help with. I was a runner, Orienteer and cyclist for many years. Then I became a gym bunny with killer Spin classes and a variety of classes only interrupted for a year with pulmonary toxicity. My hard sessions in the gym ended with inverted yoga poses until I had a stroke. My excellent Consultant Neurologist told me that she had treated someone in London who had a stroke whilst doing yoga; she advised me to avoid inverted poses. I bought the Concept 2 as I was unsure if the the gym would recognise if I had another stoke, as there were none of the usual indicators for a stroke. At home the phone or my wife are at hand and, I can put the Concept 2 in the sunshine on the garden patio. I bought the Model D second hand with about 400 km on it from new for £500. I'm now > 800 km and aimimg to get my one million metres tee shirt this year.
The sun is shining so I'm off to put in a 5km session as I'm building back from a prostate biopsy when I had to stop taking Pradaxa anticoagulant.
During this row this afternoon I remembered a couple of things. Chatting to Concept 2 Support we think that the PM5 has a small buffer for heart rate so it tends to smooth the heart rate indicated on the PM5. My heart rate changes continuously during a Concept 2 session, but the "smoothed" indication on the PM5 will be a bit behind the figure on my HRM. On those rare times that my heart rate is steady, the HRM and PM5 show the same figure.
In my gym days I always used a damper setting of 10. Then I read advice from Concept 2 that for an aerobic workout I should be using between 3 and 5. I now use a damper setting of 4. At 22 strokes / minute I really lean into the drive for 3km and my heart rate fluctuates quite a bit. If I increase the stroke rate to 26 the flywheel and fan only slow slightly so the stroke action is smoother with less variation in my heart rate. For a 10 or 12km row I warm up for 1km then row at 24 to 25 strokes.
Thanks. I will check the specification of the rower at the gym and experiment with your settings. 25 strokes/min at damper setting 4 sounds at variance with my on water experience of high load with low rate, and vice versa.
The load (watts) at a stroke rate of 22 with a damper setting of 4 will depend on how much the drive accelerates the flywheel and fan. Check the watts at different damper settings and effort. There is a video on the Concept 2 web site that demonstrates that. Like a lot of people, I thought that I needed to use a damper setting of 10. I can have a harder session for my muscles over 3km than 10 to 12 km.
The latest Fitbit models can be fairly accurate when you are active but only if you wear them several inches above your wrist