Hello Good People out there. Still looking for definitive statistics for the percentage of successful afib ablations based on authentic reputable large scale medical/clinical research. By successful I mean completely afib free and not having to take blood thinners or other medication.
Will appreciate it if this can be made clear once and for all. Thanks so very much.
Haverhill88
Written by
haverhill88
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
I don’t think there will be a definitive set of statistics based on your criteria as studies are based on patients being AF free after ablation for certain periods of time
Some studies suggest 80% plus success on the first ablation.
However there is cannot be a long term result statistic as ablation has not been an option for long enough for very long term statistics to be possible to be attainable.
You mention success without meds. This too would not necessarily be measured I don’t think. I for one am currently AF free but still taking Flecainide and I have no problem with that I spent years in PAF taking meds that did not alleviate the condition at all only perhaps reducing the frequency.
Finally warfarin and other anticoagulants (strictly speaking not blood thinners) continue to be advised and are not anything to do with control of AF. This is because an ex AF patient is still at risk of stroke potentially.
Agree totally with CDreamer. Most records talk of a five year AF free result whilst some EPs talk six months as success. Ablation has only really been around for about twenty years so what is long term?
Regarding drugs, whilst I have been AF and AF drug free these last nine years since my ablationS I would, never consider stopping anticoagulation as there is no proof that ablation removes stoke risk.
If you ever find the end of that rainbow please let us know!
I have read various articles and reports that give the impression that ablation can "cure" afib and with this in mind I find your replies very interesting and helpful.
Statistics help the planners of health care not the individual. You can never prognosticate on your own position on the bell curve that dictates statistical results.
Ablation is really not a cure for Afib. It may however stop the symptoms. They burn or freeze fences around the areas that are depolarizing. That does not stop these areas from depolarizing. The pulse is still trying to get thru. If it does, it may require another ablation. That is a simplification but it is the way that I understand it. At this point in time, I feel that we have no other options. They really have no cure yet for Afib.
Thought if symptoms gone afib gone too except with av node ablation. Are you saying heart still beating fast with a successful symptom free ablation? Bob care to comment?
No. I may have explained it wrong. The atrias should be beating in sinus rhythm after an afib ablation. The small areas that were ablated will still be depolarizing. Since they are isolated by the ablation, the depolarizing should not depolarize or fibrillate the atrias. In other words, the symptoms should be gone but I do not consider that a complete cure. If they could find out why these small areas depolarize on their own and stop the process, I would consider that a cure. This is only my opinion. I am sorry if I did not explain it clearly. It may be a matter of how we define cure, cause, and trigger.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.