Hi,
In this study they talk about Intraductal PCa patterns : Pattern 1 and Pattern 2 (with Pattern 2 not responding well to the treatment, but Pattern 1 only a little worse than "normal" PCa.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi...
After PSM, our first cohort included 108 patients with similar baseline characteristics. Among them, 50% (54/108) were diagnosed with IDC-P, with 22.2% (12/54) having IDC-P pattern 1 and 77.8% (42/54) with IDC-P pattern 2.
"Further analysis showed comparable outcomes for IDC-P pattern 1 but significantly worse prognosis for IDC-P pattern 2"
I already asked my urologist what type my IDC-P was (there was an earlier paper by the same researchers) and he emailed the pathologist. At my next appointment, he had no answer (twice). I will escalate this but need some info...
I have little understanding of the histopathology of intraductal/cribriform (which I have) but hoped someone here could answer Tall_Allen ?😉
My questions:
1) Are pattern1 and pattern 2 recognized pathologies or are they something invented by the researchers? I'd like to know so that when I write to the head of pathology I don't ask something stupid (again).
2) Is it normal that biopsy samples are no longer available for genetic testing (maybe they use all parts of the core for diagnosis?)
p.s. I hope I have pattern 1 🙂, pattern 2 sucks.
thanks ❤️