Please comment about this video. It will be helpful to hear the good and any bad about this way of presenting information. Thanks! This video is enitely based on the following article:
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 4, July 2024 , Pages 581-590
Prostate Cancer Theranostics With 177Lu-PSMA
I think you should fully and clearly disclose that it was made with that ai “turn a bunch of text into a fake podcast” tools, also, personally speaking, I find the fake bonhommie “two hosts just having a chat” deeply grating so will avoid them in future.
Thank you
Clear and informative. A bit AI/robotic but doesn't get in the way too much. Obviously US orientated which can be irritating to other cultures - I'm from the UK. Woman's/doctor's voice less annoying than male/interviewer voice. I like the way this and sister video emphasises personalisation and importance of active patient participation.
Thank you
In all honesty, I don't like videos or podcasts. I am a fast reader and would far rather read the information than sit there and listen to it at a slower pace. I watched a few minutes - yes, there is helpful info there, but I bailed b/c it felt like an inefficient use of my time.
Some of our members would rather read than listen. Understood. Thanks. The transcript (which you can read like an article, independent from watching the video) is linked in the description.
Was not allowed into apps. typical of AI technology🙄, I was misdiagnosed with Prostate Cancer anyway, so one of the lucky ones🤞
App??? This a YouTube video.
Okay what ever it is did not allow me into it long rigmarole of how🙄 I was misdiagnosed with Prostate Cancer in 2022, [schwannomas on my prostate gland] after radiation treatment and Decapeptyl SR injections, aggravated my pectus carinatum, life threatening rib cage structure, politely told in Nov 2023 that I would not need any more PSA's!
I think the video is clear, though a bit repetitive and disjointed. The captioning has quite a number of errors. Unlike some commenters above, I don’t mind that it is AI generated content, but I agree that should be disclosed. Thanks for an interesting video!
Thank you
amazingly clear. Simplifies complex treatment.
Thank you
The conversational flow is a bit awkward, but the biggest concern I had was the lack of information about post infusion care. The information felt unfinished to me. It is much more than hydration and patients and their families want and need to know common sense isolation information. Sure, they depend on their doctors for that, but it is a major concern and requires preplanning.
Overall, not ready for prime time. People are freaked out enough over all cancer topics without trying to parse a rapid-fire discussion of a complex treatment, especially with a very condescending-toned woman giving an explanation to some poor fool of an uninterested man reading a script (I know it's AI, but this is what it sounds like to me).
1. Give the track a second or two before starting so the first word isn't cut off -- just jumps into a very rapid explanation without any subject intro. I wouldn't have listened as long as I did if you hadn't asked.
2. Proof read to avoid PET in one place and PE immediately after
3. Slow. it. down! Sounds very unnatural, as if there's some sort of hurry to get through all this information. I didn't make it all the way through because listening was tiring.
4. Check pronunciations. My doctors pronounce several medical terms, including lutetium, completely differently so that makes it confusing at first -- good thing there's text.
5. Define all acronyms. MCRPRC is referred to without explaining what it is. Seems to me that would have been explained in an introduction to exactly what is going to be discussed.
My 2¢
it does a good job of explaining the protocol & discussing benefits & shortcomings of the treatment.
It becomes repetitive at about 6 minutes in, as it switches to different aspects like "what to expect" etc. I think the dialogue is clear.
Basically, I'm OK with it. But it does sound like a commercial from a drug company -- both the style, and the voices. If I were the producer, I'd choose a single narrator .
Thank you
Where are the people behind the voices? I know, AI. Not a lot of effort went into it. Boring.
Lutetium 177 treatment options
lutetium 177
Limitations of Lutetium-177-PSMA and addressing treatment challenges
Lutetium 177
