After waiting for two months to get a CT guided bone-biopsy and the results, my MO has discussed her best treatment option as follows:
Eligard, XTANDI, Radiation - and XGEVA
Her rationale is that my metastatic "load" isn't big enough to warrant chemo since it's only in the bones, not in any other organs. She prefers to save chemo for m1C patients. She thinks chemo therapy is too risky vs the benefits (risk of infection from compromised immunity) considering radiation can get the bone mets and the prostate as well.
She had a treatment plan options list printed out from some guidelines program. Eligard, XTANDI, radiation was the first option, and Triplet Therapy was the second on the list. She doesn't want to prescribe duralutimide because it's 2x per day
I'm frustrated that she agreed to consider Triplet Therapy in my initial visit with her, even though at the time we knew the mets were only in bones.
I'm also very frustrated that she recommended radiation TWO MONTHS after my first meeting with her where she was shocked that the RO already had a treatment plan even before a bone biopsy was done: "she has a plan, before the biopsy, how is she sure it's metastatic cancer lesion?'
I could have started and been finished with radiation by now.
I guess I should have gone for second opinions while waiting all those time, but didn't. Shame on me, I thought she'd go with the triplets.
Can't decide for second opinion if I should go to City of Hope, UCLA, or Dr Scholz. My RO is at CoH near my home, and they have a couple of MOs at that facility listed down the "Prostate Cancer Care Team on CoH website. Convenience, there, but UCLA just seems to be calling to me but I hear it's a hassle location.
I might change my handle to Frustrated and Exhausted...