CD105 inhibitor carotuximab. Forty pe... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,855 members27,377 posts

CD105 inhibitor carotuximab. Forty percent of those patients experienced progression-free survival, based on radiographic imaging.

Scout4answers profile image
10 Replies

From MaleCare newsletter

Looks very interesting...

sciencedaily.com/releases/2...

Written by
Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
10 Replies
cesanon profile image
cesanon

What is a CD105 inhibitor and who would be most interested in it, and who would be least interested in it?

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to cesanon

New randomized studies will use certain biomarkers to try and answer this question.

mab class of drug sounds like maybe a immuneo type?

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to cesanon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Carotuximab

Monoclonal antibody

Source Chimeric (mouse/human)

Target endoglin

Other names TRC-105

Carotuximab (INN[1]) (TRC-105) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody designed for the treatment of cancer.

This drug was developed by Tracon Pharmaceuticals Inc.[2]

It is at Phase III trials for angiosarcoma.

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to cesanon

PRESS RELEASE

<< Back

Printer Friendly

TRACON Pharmaceuticals Announces Termination Of Phase 3 TAPPAS Trial Based On The Recommendation Of The Independent Data Monitoring Committee

Company to Host Investor Conference Call Today at 8:30 a.m. EDT / 5:30 a.m. PDT

SAN DIEGO, April 12, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- TRACON Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:TCON), a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel targeted therapeutics for cancer and, through our license to Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., wet age-related macular degeneration, today announced that its Phase 3 TAPPAS trial evaluating TRC105 in combination with Votrient (pazopanib) in patients with advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma was terminated for futility based on the recommendation of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) following its review of interim unblinded safety and efficacy data from more than 120 patients enrolled in the trial at the time of the analysis.

TRACON will work with investigators to appropriately conclude the study in a manner consistent with the best interests of each patient. Data from this study will be analyzed and submitted for presentation at an upcoming scientific congress.

“We are disappointed that TRC105 in combination with Votrient did not demonstrate clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with advanced or metastatic angiosarcoma,” said Charles Theuer, M.D. Ph.D., President and CEO of TRACON. “Given these data, we will terminate further enrollment in company sponsored trials of TRC105 in oncology. We will continue to support our partner, Santen, in their development of DE-122 in wet AMD, where the anti-angiogenic and anti-fibrotic properties of endoglin inhibition may be more relevant than in oncology. We will also continue to develop our other drug candidates, including TRC253 in partnership with Janssen and TJ004309 (also known as TJ-D5) in partnership with I-Mab, and, intend to advance candidates within I-Mab’s broad bispecific pipeline into the clinic in the US as early as the beginning of next year. We will also continue our business development efforts to source additional innovative products to fortify our pipeline through risk share and cost share arrangements. On a financial note, as a result of the expected savings to be generated from terminating TRACON sponsored trials of TRC105, we anticipate our current cash runway will now extend into the third quarter of 2020.”

tango65 profile image
tango65

Very interesting. If it works it is what everybody with CRPC needs.

Benkaymel profile image
Benkaymel in reply to tango65

Well, 40% of everybody with CRPC, but still gives another avenue of hope.

tango65 profile image
tango65 in reply to Benkaymel

Everybody will needed it, 40% will respond. For an advanced cancer therapy a 40% response it is not something to ignore.

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to tango65

We really don't know how selectively the drug was given in the small study

Benkaymel profile image
Benkaymel in reply to tango65

I agree and was trying to say the same thing. We don't know if we're in the 40% or not so have to take it and hope we are.

Spyder54 profile image
Spyder54

thanks Scout. Also Splice Variants blocked. Only 9 in study w 40% good response. Did the study say how long they avoided biochemical recurrence? Thanks, Mike

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Welcome to the world's first artificial intelligence prostate cancer newsletter, delivering information tailored to your needs.

Sign up for the world's first Artificial Intelligence-driven prostate cancer newsletter here:...

Interesting new research on why ARI drugs like Xtandi fail

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/09/220915104739.htm?utm_medium=email&utm_source=rasa_io&u

AI traces mysterious metastatic cancers to their source

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01110-8?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placemen

Benefit of statins while on ADT

https://www.practiceupdate.com/c/77251/67/11/?elsca1=emc_enews_weekinreview&elsca2=email&elsca3=prac

Experimental cancer therapy shows success in more than 70% of patients in global clinical trials

Myeloma is only cancer mentioned...