LU 177: Hello Gents, Considering... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,373 members28,135 posts

LU 177

Survivor1965 profile image
40 Replies

Hello Gents,

Considering going off my COBRA policy and getting onto Medicare Part B to save some money. Currently on Xtandi, Xgeva, Lupron/Eligard. I have the costs figured for my current meds but tough to know cost for the future meds once the current stop working, which is a virtual certainty the way it is explained to me.

Anyone on Medicare A, B, D be willing to give me an idea on what you pay for something like LU177 or Chemo? I asked Mayo PHx and they told me they havent actually administered LU177 yet so cant give me estimates.

Pretty tough to know if I should switch if I cant figure out future med costs

Many thanks, Johnny

Written by
Survivor1965 profile image
Survivor1965
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
40 Replies
tango65 profile image
tango65

You will need a medicare supplemental plan to pay part or the totality of the 20% that Medicare part B does not pay.

medicare.gov/medigap-supple...

everydayhealth.com/medicare...

The advantage plans may pay for everything if the treatments are done in the network, but you give your medicare to the insurance companies. In these plans. the hospitals and the doctors bill the insurance company and they can not bill medicare. There are places which may not accept medicare advantage.

I prefer a PPO.. I keep my medicare and I can go to any place where medicare is accepted. Drs and Hospitals bill medicare and they also bill the insurance (PPO) and I pay 20% of the 20% that medicare part B does not cover.

leebeth profile image
leebeth

We have Medicare and a supplement, Plan G. We pay nothing. Everything is paid for after the annual $233 deductible. Pluvicto, chemo, no charge. We have an Rx plan through my former employer, which is expensive but his Orgovyx and Xtandi are free. For the two of us, our total monthly premiums, including IRMAA surcharges, are around $1200.

It’s worth it to us c

Bvilkid profile image
Bvilkid in reply toleebeth

Thanks for the info. What insurance company do you use?

leebeth profile image
leebeth in reply toBvilkid

We went through Boomer Benefits. They are so helpful. I did a lot of comparison first. We have an Aetna plan. All supplements are the same, within a category, for what they cover. They all must cover the 20% that Medicare does not cover. So the only difference is rate, rate history, and processing speed. Best of luck to you!

Bvilkid profile image
Bvilkid in reply toleebeth

Thanks!

Concerned-wife profile image
Concerned-wife

The treatments you mention are covered and you buy a Medicare supplement to cover the 20% copay. You also should buy a Part D plan for pills. Pills are not covered by Medicare. Go to Medicare.gov and you can study the costs of plans where you live

Alternatively you can buy a Medicare Advantage plan but they can restrict your providers.

Medicare.gov has info on MA too

I have read from other men , but not used, Boomer Benefits can help you do this free. Or you can find a local broker but beware of what plans they sell

Bdale profile image
Bdale

I also have Medicare A and B, a plan G Medicare supplement plan, and a prescription plan (part D). Eventhough I don't use Abiraterone anymore this is probably the most important benefit. Formularies change almost every year, so it makes sense to use a good agent that can guide you. The only thing I have to pay for my Keytruda infusion is the annual part B deductible. Initially a Medicare Supplement is around $147 a month. It does go up as you age at a rate of approximately $10 per month per year. If your doctors are in the network and the formulary has your drugs, a Medicare Advantage with drugs (MA-PD) maybe a good choice. They have things like dental, vision and hearing as well as all drugs and you should get the PPO version allowing you to have a greater choice of providers. Hope this helps a little, good luck with you treatment, my brother just went through 6 sessions with Lu177 in the Netherlands and feels ok.

To qualify for Medicare you have to be 65 or be fully disabled if younger.

I have Aetna Medicare PPO advantage plan (Medicare Part C), and have had everything covered to date. They do cover up to 6 treatments of Pluvicto.

cfrees1 profile image
cfrees1

I’m not a shill for the company but I found Boomer Benefits to be really helpful when I went through the process. They explained that since Part D changes every year, it doesn’t pay to worry about future medications and they will help you choose the best plan for the medications you take NOW. As for the ones you mention, all of those are 80% covered by Part B, with the remaining 20% covered by a Medigap plan. I am on the MN version of Part G.

ron_bucher profile image
ron_bucher

I don't recall paying anything for my Taxotere under Medicare in 2017. I gave up my company sponsored PPO plan to switch to Medicare in 2016. After my premiums for Medicare and AARP United Healthcare Medicare Supplement, I've rarely had to pay anything out of pocket for any diagnostic or treatment. Some of my medications require modest out of pocket expenses, the most expensive being Eliquis @ ~$250-300 every 3 months. Have been waiting for a generic Eliquis to come along.

groth12345 profile image
groth12345 in reply toron_bucher

You can get generic Eliquis from Canadian Pharmacies like Maple Leaf. $160 for 3 months.

ron_bucher profile image
ron_bucher in reply togroth12345

Thank you!!

ron_bucher profile image
ron_bucher in reply toron_bucher

Looks like they have Apixaban 5mg 180 pills @ $150

groth12345 profile image
groth12345 in reply toron_bucher

Yes, plus $9.95 shipping. Good deal and they are excellent on following up with the renewals and shipping details. Pill looks identical.

Survivor1965 profile image
Survivor1965

I am only 56 so cant get a medigap plan in AZ, have to be 65 here. Also cant use part C medicare because Mayo Clinic here in AZ doesn’t take advantage plans. Should've put all of this in my original post.

Bdale profile image
Bdale in reply toSurvivor1965

You could look at becoming Social Security Disability Income eligible, if you have a certain type of prostate cancer you automatically qualify, which means you will get the max SS benefit and qualify for medicare.

Survivor1965 profile image
Survivor1965 in reply toBdale

I feel like we may have explored that but we make too much money. However I will check it out. Thank you!

lokibear0803 profile image
lokibear0803

I’d add a caveat around Medicare + supplement covering all costs for things like Lu-177, chemo, etc — that is (well, “should be”) true, but only if you have the medical condition that qualifies you…e.g. you must be castrate-resistant and have prior exposure to a taxane to qualify for Lu-177 treatment. As I understand it,, whatever FDA has approved as per clinical trial (e.g. VISION in the case of Lu-177 aka Pluvicto) is the basis for what Medicare will cover.

I would love for someone to tell me I’m wrong on this. The acronym I use for that type of thing is 2G2BT….

Foldem profile image
Foldem in reply tolokibear0803

That is my understanding. I’ll be doing chemo starting in a few weeks so I can get LU-177 early next year.

lokibear0803 profile image
lokibear0803 in reply toFoldem

How many infusions do you plan to get? If it comes to needing chemo to get Pluvicto, my thought is to do the least possible amount.

groth12345 profile image
groth12345 in reply toFoldem

I think you cannot get Lu-177 until all other treatments have failed. Also, I've read where having chemo in front of Lu-177 makes Lutetium less effective.

lokibear0803 profile image
lokibear0803 in reply togroth12345

if you can find that reference and point me to it, that would be great. I’m not all that clear around whether chemo per se makes it less effective, or whether being further progressed and thus needing chemo is what makes it less effective.

groth12345 profile image
groth12345 in reply tolokibear0803

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl...

States: " Prior chemotherapy has been shown to be a worse predictor of response and survival outcomes with 177Lu-PSMA-RLT [22–24]. In a retrospective study, Barber et al. observed better PSA response outcomes in taxane-naïve patients as compared to taxane-pretreated patients (57% versus 40%, respectively) [22]".

Survivor1965 profile image
Survivor1965 in reply togroth12345

That may not bode well for me as Ive done 21 rounds of chemo

groth12345 profile image
groth12345 in reply toSurvivor1965

How about Provenge?

lokibear0803 profile image
lokibear0803 in reply toSurvivor1965

If you read that NIH paper from groth12345 in link above, I believe there’s one section describing a reasonably good set of responses even for those with taxane exposure. I wouldn’t rule it out.

I’m still not convinced that it’s the chemo per se; I’d bet there would still be a wide range of outcomes for those who’ve done chemo, same as for those who haven’t. Keep the hope, brother.

lokibear0803 profile image
lokibear0803 in reply togroth12345

Thank you for that link! Very appreciated.

From a (very) quick read of the paper, it seems we have correlation — but not causation. The study was retrospective, and the author freely admits an underpowered sample size for, IIRC, all but one endpoint. If someone has read the paper more closely than I did, and has a better insight, please correct me.

This correlation, regardless, is something I’ve been aware of and I’m not dismissing it. I’m just still trying to clarify whether chemo-naive patients do better on Lu-177 only b/c they needed the chemo since they were further progressed, and the later disease stage explained a trend of weaker Lu-177 responses … or whether there is some biological impact from the chemo that specifically undermines subsequent Lu-177 treatment, even if the patient does chemo in an earlier stage of disease.

groth12345 profile image
groth12345 in reply tolokibear0803

Very possible. Further progression won't have as good of an outcome.

Fightinghard profile image
Fightinghard

SurvivorMedicare coverage usually follows FDA approval but there can be a lag time before medicare adds the new treatment to the approved listing. The FDA snd Medicare are not linked and both can be slow

Spyder54 profile image
Spyder54

I am on Medicare A,B,D. PLus United Healthcare SUpp. 80/20 rule. Med pays 80%. Supp 20%. I have been to Mayo, MD Anderson, U of F, MSKCC, Moffitt all accepting both. On Zytiga, plan D didnt help much but GOOD RX by passes and gives choices for best price. Was at Walmart. Now at Publix. New bill signed yesterday will max out at $166/mo or $2,000/yr. Dont know on Taxanes (Docetaxel but assume you will be covered. I was with a 200,000 employee healthcare plan that was supposed to be gold std. was more expensive (3x more$), and still had major deductibles. If we could only get the 100 US Senators off their special ins, and on Medicare, it would probably be even better. Only my humble opinion, Mike

Foldem profile image
Foldem in reply toSpyder54

Congress is on the ACA available nationwide. They get about 80% of their premiums paid for by their employer, us.

Foldem profile image
Foldem

On the Medicare plan, your drug expenses are capped at $2,000 by the legislation just passed. I have Kaiser and Advantage. Fortunately Kaiser has almost every kind of specialist on staff, so referrals are never an issue. They also pay for my gym membership.

Twice I was referred to outside professionals in the last few years at no cost to me.

Kaiser is a nonprofit, which I believe alleviates a lot of nonsense about denying claims. I would probably never again get profit seeking insurance.

Good luck!

Survivor1965 profile image
Survivor1965 in reply toFoldem

I thought that legislation would take effect in 2025??

swwags profile image
swwags in reply toSurvivor1965

you are correct. 2025.

Survivor1965 profile image
Survivor1965 in reply toswwags

I could already be gone by then 🤪😂

swwags profile image
swwags in reply toSurvivor1965

Nope - that's just stinkin thinkin. Hang around longer pls.

Survivor1965 profile image
Survivor1965 in reply toswwags

I’m taking my medicine like a big boy

Spyder54 profile image
Spyder54 in reply toSurvivor1965

If 2025 is correct, check GOOD Rx website. Plug in drugname. It tells you what prices are lowest -and as I mentioned that can change. Mike

groth12345 profile image
groth12345 in reply toFoldem

The new Inflation Reduction Bill does lower drugs etc but for most on high cost ones it won't be until 2026 I believe.

groth12345 profile image
groth12345

But it could be 2025

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Lu-177 or Cabazitaxel

My dad has taken Zytiga for 1 year even though it’s not really work. His current PSA is greater 34,...

Early access to LU 177

I will be getting early access to Lu177 and start my 6 cycles in December. Has anyone had this...
shipoo profile image

Lu 177

Could any of you tell me if there is still a hold on LU177, if so any idea as to when it’s going to...
Fight11 profile image

Lu 177 overseas

So it looks like we will be traveling overseas for Lu 177 treatments. My husband's psa is now up to...
Dalipup profile image

Lu 177 results

Has anyone heard of any preliminary results from the vision trial? Could those who have had Lu177...

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.