Some might be interested in a particular country or might like to compare their home rate with neighboring countries. Others will see it as pointless navel gazing, of course.
Perhaps you or someone else might experience a brilliant insight? We have enough members.
I'm hoping for some interest, of course.
A chunk of the Discussion section is devoted to the USPSTF recommendations & effects.
At first blush it would be easy to conclude that the answer lies with the Med Diet of Greece, Italy, and Spain with its low consumption of meat and animal fat vs the diet of the Scandinavians with its higher consumption of dairy products. However, with what little I know about these two cultural regions, I could also conclude that health care systems and attitude of men towards going to doctors for prostate exam may also be a contributing factor (not very macho, etc.).--K
Note that I reported only death rates. If screening is low in a particular country - regardless of reasons - PCa will be discovered at a late stage. i.e. the death rate should be higher in a 'macho' country.
SELECT was an extraordinary study in terms of cost & poor design.
Regarding the selenium arms, men received it regardless of selenium status & even if they were already supplementing. Also, the U.S. population is not noted for deficiency. &, it has long been known that the benefit does not increase with dose. So, a small percentage of men were rescued from deficiency, while a larger percentage at the opposite end were put at risk.
In the case of the synthetic alpha tocopherol, it was also well known that the 8 isomers of vitamin E compete for transport. If you increase intake of one, it will drive down levels of the other 7. Particularly protective gamma tocopherol. Dumb.
Widely acknowledged that it didn't put to bed selenium supplementation. However, it did not give any support to high-dose selenium sups.
I agree that it only showed that e alpha-tocopherol might not be good for PCa. Increasing delta and gamma in both forms had and have better evidence for therapy and the trial pretty much caused the inverse situation to occur. Still, in general, I don't like to put things in my body unless I can read good RCT evidence and/or my MO advises me to.
We need to look into studies as you obviously have. Remember the WHI hormone study? They proved that there was a small increase in cancer risk (yet no statistically significant OS change) if you take conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate. Bioidentical anyone?
I wanted to see if there is any kind of correlation so I plotted the data in excel and compared it to the longitude of each state.
Results:
Occurrence
average long Best 50% -95.4
average long Worst 50% -87.8
Correlation Coef for all raw data 0.26319864
A weak correlation. The countries have a strong correlation. Both coefficients are positive. Could be a coincidence but that's really stretching IMO. A more likely answer is sun exposure so vitamin D, OR sun exposure so stronger circadian cycle and more melatonin, OR sun exposure fosters more exercise. Or perhaps something else? Until we know the answer I won't spend much time on it. I'll exercise, get my vitamin D, sometimes take melatonin, and go hiking in the sun. I like hiking and exercising so, regardless of what benefits they may or may not have, I enjoy enjoying life.
Possibly education is better in southern states, or more leisure time, or more access to medical care. I really don't know the answer but 70 data points do point to more than chance.
Thanks for running the spreadsheet again. The latitude difference is impressive. Rapid City SD is at 44 deg. Raleigh NC is about 36. Now feeling good about spending March in Florida. Latitude = 27.
Found this study:"We showed previously that Caucasian mortality rates from prostate cancer for 1970-1979 are significantly inversely correlated with ultraviolet (UV) radiation. We now present the analysis of prostate cancer mortality data over a 45-year period (1950-1994)"
"Results: For U.S. Caucasians, prostate cancer mortality rates at the county and SEA levels followed a significant north-south spatial trend that is the inverse of UV radiation. We found significant inverse correlations between UV radiation and prostate cancer mortality at all time points over this 45-year period. These correlations were significantly more pronounced at locations north of 40 degrees N latitude."
Thanks Patrick,Since no one can accurately predict the future it's better to get buried in studies than unknown potential.
In 2018 2 docs responded to my question with; "months..... Unlikely to see end of 2018..."
While obviously wrong, I'm still here, it did educate me about the seriousness of MY disease. I asked for the estimation. I'm grateful for their honesty.
Thank you for posting this study. With children and grandchildren living in Belgium, France and Spain and given my family history, it is of great interest. Cannot help but conclude that med diet and sunny climate are factors. Am regularly reminding my sons about this..
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.