Metformin may delay PCa progression. - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

20,943 members26,080 posts

Metformin may delay PCa progression.

pjoshea13 profile image
14 Replies

More from ESMO 2020:

mdedge.com/hematology-oncol...

"Adding metformin to standard care for advanced prostate cancer appeared to lengthen time to castration-resistant disease in a small, randomized trial.

“According to our data, metformin potentially prolongs the time to progression … when combined with androgen deprivation therapy,” said investigator Reham ALGhandour, MD, PhD, an assistant lecturer of medical oncology at Mansoura (Egypt) University.

Dr. ALGhandour presented the data at the European Society for Medical Oncology Virtual Congress 2020.

Prior observational studies have indicated that metformin may benefit patients with prostate cancer. A meta-analysis of cohort studies suggested metformin can significantly improve overall, cancer-specific, and recurrence-free survival in prostate cancer patients.

To explore this further, Dr. ALGhandour and colleagues conducted a randomized trial. They enrolled 124 men with high-risk locally advanced or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

The investigators randomized 62 patients to testosterone suppression with or without antiandrogen, and 62 others to a standard regimen plus metformin at 850 mg twice daily.

All patients had an Easter Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-2, were set to receive androgen deprivation therapy long term, and had no prior metformin use. Docetaxel was permitted for metastatic patients, and external beam radiation therapy was used for localized and regional disease.

Results: ‘Dramatic’ but not ‘definitive’

At a median follow-up of 18 months, there was a significant difference in time to castration-resistant prostate cancer. The median time to progression was 29 months with metformin and 20 months with standard therapy alone (P = .01).

Subgroup analyses showed a benefit with metformin in men with N1 disease (P = .001) and men with localized disease/low tumor burden (P = .008).

There was no significant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms (P = .1). The median overall survival was not reached in either arm.

About 4% of metformin patients had grade 2 diarrhea, but adverse events were otherwise comparable between the arms and mostly related to androgen deprivation.

“The authors have got some pretty dramatic findings,” said Noel Clarke, MBBS, a consultant urologist at Salford Royal Hospital and The Christie, Manchester, England, who was a discussant for the study.

Dr. Clarke said the data are “hypothesis generating,” but, because of small numbers, the study “really falls well short of anything that is definitive.”

“We’ll have to wait for bigger studies,” Dr. Clarke said, adding that one arm of the STAMPEDE trial has recruited 2,200 prostate cancer patients to standard of care plus metformin.

“We will report on this trial presently,” he said. “Hopefully, this will add to the body of literature which will determine whether or not metformin is useful with standard of care in this disease.”

Dr. Clarke said the possible benefits of metformin are probably related to energetics in prostate cancer.

“AMPK [AMP-activated protein kinase] is the energy superhighway regulator,” he explained. “[I]t slows down the effects of cell proliferation and energy usage, and it promotes the use of energy storage mechanisms.

“Metformin, because it acts on AMPK to up-regulate it … enhances the effect of AMPK, shutting down the catabolic elements and impeding other elements of prostate cancer migration. So AMPK inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition, which is well known as a metastatic mechanism.”

There was no outside funding for this study, and the investigators didn’t report any disclosures. Dr. Clarke disclosed relationships with Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca.

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: ALGhandour R et al. ESMO 2020, Abstract 617MO.

Written by
pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
14 Replies
GreenStreet profile image
GreenStreet

Patrick thanks for posting. Interesting. Will also be interesting to see outputs if STAMPEDE.

TheTopBanana profile image
TheTopBanana

Thank you! Did they use PSMA or what kind of scan to define metastatic?

pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13 in reply to TheTopBanana

I have no other info, except for inclusion criteria:

"Inclusion Criteria:

High-risk newly diagnosed non-metastatic node-negative disease at least two of:

Stage T3/4, PSA≥40ng/ml or Gleason sum score 8-10

Intention to treat with radical radiotherapy (unless there is a contraindication)

OR newly diagnosed metastatic or node-positive disease at least one of:

Stage T any N+ M0

Stage T any Nany M+

OR previously treated with radical surgery and/or radiotherapy, now relapsing

At least one of:

(-PSA ≥4ng/ml and rising with doubling time less than 6 months,N+, M+)

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

***

My guess is mostly not PSMA.

-Patrick

Cheerr profile image
Cheerr

Patrick, I read in another post that it showed no difference for men who are heavily metastatic. Is that true?

My dad was diagnosed with skeleton bone mets so I’m assuming that is what being heavily metastatic means?

pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13 in reply to Cheerr

Hi Cheerr,

Apologies to Noahware! He posted the results of the MANSMED trial, & my account makes no mention of MANSMED, but they refer to the same trial. His account has the "high volume metastatic disease" reference.

Only 62 men received 850mg Metformin. Some were not metastatic, but we don't know how many. These did well.

For the men with mets, node-positive men did well too.

It appears that with bone mets, those with the highest volume found no benefit.

I think we need a bigger intervention study to get a better picture. And I hope that they will use the 2,000mg dose used by the Swiss study on CRPC cases - the one that finally convinced Dr. Myers. 2,00mg seems to be the dose that his patients aim for. It's what I use.

Do you have a count of your dad's bone mets? And some sense of "volume"?

Best, -Patrick

Cheerr profile image
Cheerr in reply to pjoshea13

Hi Patrick,

My dad had skeleton mets (Not countable) and no visceral ones on diagnosis. After 6 rounds of chemo, there were about 3 hot spots lingering.

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

Thanks.... for the Metformin go around....

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Monday 09/21/2020 6:14 PM DST

EdBar profile image
EdBar

I’ve been taking Metformin and ADT for 6 plus years now per Snuffy Myers, PSA remains undetectable. I’ve been able to maintain normal BMI as well, along with exercise and a Mediterranean diet. Snuffy was way ahead of his time.

Ed

podsart profile image
podsart in reply to EdBar

Per Snuffy Myers, I am in same boat

SK1MC profile image
SK1MC

I'm a diabetic on 1000mg X 2 daily. I'm also G9, nmcrpc, and I have had recurrence at every step. Post-Op, post-radiation w/Lupron, and now after a year break and one six-month Eligard shot into a new ADT treatment.

If metformin helps, I hate to think where I would be without it.

GeorgesCalvez profile image
GeorgesCalvez

I think you have to view it as a complementary therapy to ADT.

In some cases it may delay the progress of the cancer and in other cases it may not.

It is worth remembering that ADT is more or less successful, some men progress quite quickly while others manage to stay on ADT for several years or more without progression.

The good thing is that metformin is cheap and readily available and has few side effects in most people.

It is worth giving it a go particularly if your blood glucose is a little high. My blood glucose was above the normal range but below a type 2 diabetic so I had no problem persuading my doctor to give me a prescription.

Cooolone profile image
Cooolone

Hate to kick dust off an old thread...

But isn't AMPK activation "BAD" in consideration of PCa proliferation? I've read both arguments being made. But that the upregulation of AMPK is not a favorable result for PCa patients. So it's weird how Metformin and also Berberine have been found to be beneficial to PCa patients. I haven't been able to find definitive sway to either argument... Or is it that the other effects of the drug hold more result than the AMPK influence?...

pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13 in reply to Cooolone

The case for AMPK activation is that it inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and other signal transduction mechanisms.

Cooolone profile image
Cooolone in reply to pjoshea13

Yes, I've read so much, lol, it's still a little scary how these things work both For and Against! Lol...

I think the amount of data indicating benefit outweigh risk. Thank you for your follow-up.

You may also like...

Metformin: Preliminary Results of Trial in Advanced Prostate Cancer (MANSMED)

prospective randomized controlled trial. This trial recruited men with high risk localized or...

Addition of Metformin after Progression on Abiraterone.

Pilot study below [1]. \\"Twenty-five men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and...

Testosterone & Castration-Resistant PCa.

Abstract Most men with metastatic prostate cancer who are treated with androgen deprivation therapy...

Reducing saturated fat intake may delay progression in men with MYC amplification

only a mouse study, but they also looked at animal fat/saturated fat intake of metastatic men...

Effects of Metformin and Statins on MCRPC

rologic-oncology/prostate-cancer/137274-effects-of-metformin-and-statins-on-outcomes-in-men-with-cas