Questions about active surveillance - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,322 members3,392 posts

Questions about active surveillance

Azbound profile image
9 Replies

Question about prostate cancer. Biopsy 3 + 4 Gleason. 6 out of 12 course positive couple 30%, the rest 10. Pirad 2 MRI which is low I believe 0.41 decipher low bone scan negative CAT scan negative. PSA went from 7.3 down to 4.5 over about 4 months. I'm considering cyber knife or active surveillance. Would like to get some opinions about active surveillance.

Written by
Azbound profile image
Azbound
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
9 Replies
pd63 profile image
pd63

How many cores were 4

Azbound profile image
Azbound in reply topd63

2 have 30% 1 have 20% 1 have 10% 2 have 5% Out of 12 core samples. These are the percentages of four with the rest of the percentage being grade 3 left side 6 cores is benign.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Good idea to get a second opinion from Johns Hopkins:

pathology.jhu.edu/patient-c...

Please answer these questions:

1. For each of the cores that have GS 3+4, what % of each of those cores had cancer?

2. For each of the cores that have GS 3+4, what % of the cancer was pattern 4?

The report from Johns Hopkins will tell you if your current report doesn't.

The decision on whether it is safe to stay on AS depends on it.

Azbound profile image
Azbound in reply toTall_Allen

2 have 30% 1 have 20% 1 have 10% 2 have 5%

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toAzbound

Question 2?

Azbound profile image
Azbound in reply toTall_Allen

percentages above are the percentages of four in each core. The rest of the core is three in all of the above. The other side left shows benign. Out of a 12 core biopsy so half six are positive with the percentages stated above being 4. So six of the cores out of 12 two of them have 30% for two of them have 5%, one has 20% and one has 10%.

addicted2cycling profile image
addicted2cycling in reply toAzbound

Your age would help.

1st - if me a 2nd opinion IS a must.

Be aware that imaging can still miss PCa and your post reads like you had a TRUS biopsy that can also miss higher Gleason PCa.

2nd - no Dr. here but I would be uneasy going with AS.

Azbound profile image
Azbound in reply toaddicted2cycling

No it was not a trus went through the rectum for the biopsy. They got me down for a pet scan Thursday that's about the last test. Not sure I needed a pet a cat at MRI decipher. But I would think if the pet Scan is negative the only other thing I could do is get a second opinion on my biopsy

addicted2cycling profile image
addicted2cycling in reply toAzbound

TRUS biopsy is via the rectum. Getting a 2nd opinion on biopsy is wise no matter what scan or other testing results are.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

I have a question about active surveillance opinion

I kind of asked this question before but yesterday I went for a PET scan nothing found I've had an...
Azbound profile image

Active surveillance

A friend of mine is on active surveillance (Gleason 4 + 3; N0 M0). Diagnosed 2022. In 2023 he had...
Nomiskneh profile image

No more active surveillance for me

65 yr, good physical condition. After 10 years BPH symptoms and a steadily rising PSA, I was...
Adf2529 profile image

Active Surveillance

So I've seen 7-8 doctors and the news is about as good as it can be for a guy with prostate...
peterman profile image

Active Surveillance/2nd Biopsy

Hello everyone, I just received the results from my 2nd prostate bx while on active surveillance....
ironmanburg profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.