My friend had his PETscan. - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,261 members3,329 posts

My friend had his PETscan.

WhatHump profile image
5 Replies

I'm not at all familiar with PETscans. Friend has not talked to Doc that I am aware of. Just sent me these. My read is this is good; no metastasis that they are aware of. Feedback very much appreciated.

Hump

Study Result

Impression

IMPRESSION:

1. Focus of radiotracer uptake seen in the left peripheral zone, consistent with MRI findings, with max SUV of 7.8. No findings of distant abnormal radiotracer uptake.

Christopher Duncan, MD

4/13/2023 3:50 PM

Interpreted by:

Christopher T Duncan, MD

Signed by:

Christopher T Duncan, MD

4/13/23

Final result

Narrative

INDICATION: Neoplasm: prostate

COMPARISON: None, correlation with MRI 2/1/23

TECHNIQUE:

-Dose: 10 mCi F18-FDG.

-Resting blood glucose level: 78 mg/dL.

-Field-of-View: Whole body imaging was performed from the skull base to the thighs.

-CT Correlation: Low-dose CT imaging was performed for attenuation correction with reconstruction image sets were created, along with fusion imaging of the CT and PET

data sets. A three-dimensional volume rendering was also generated.

FINDINGS:

Head and neck: Physiologic activity is seen within the visualized portions of the brain parenchyma.

Thorax: Physiologic activity is noted within the heart.

Abdomen/pelvis: Physiologic activity present within the GI and GU system. Focus of radiotracer uptake seen in the left peripheral zone, consistent with MRI findings, with max SUV of 7.8.

Musculoskeletal: No abnormal FDG avid activity noted within the musculoskeletal system apart from expected mild uptake due to degenerative changes.

Low-dose CT: Bibasilar platelike atelectasis. Moderate degenerative changes. There is colonic diverticulosis without CT evidence of active diverticulitis.

Written by
WhatHump profile image
WhatHump
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
5 Replies
Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers

Where is he going for treatment?

Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_ in reply toScout4answers

Scout, maybe you need stronger reading glasses. It is FDG PET not PSMA PET scan!

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply toJustfor_

Thanks I missed that...

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

FDG showed that there was cancer within his prostate and nowhere else. FDG is not often used for prostate cancer, because it is not sensitive for it. Why did he have an FDG PET scan?

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

Me thinks Hump had a great fall.............

j-o-h-n <===<<< Senior management is about to spike my spikes....

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Tuesday 04/18/2023 6:46 PM DST

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Psma-pet scan results

PCa Warriors: I am on Active Surveillance(AS )with one core GL6 at 10%. I am part of a clinical...
witantric profile image

Opinions on my 2nd MRI results

Hello, I just received the results from 2nd MRI (results below and photos in reply), previous one...
Maximode profile image

PSMA PET

I am 60 years old, PSA 6.03 and diagnosed with PC after a TRUS biopsy January 22. The biopsy...

Seeking Advice

I'm working with the premise I'm experiencing a BCR. After 2 years of undetectable psa, my recent...

After Active Surveillance since 2013, time to explore treatment options

I am new here, and found out about this place from reading TallAllen's blog "Prostate Cancer News,...

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.