NCCN guidelines for unfavorable inte... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

4,943 members3,077 posts

NCCN guidelines for unfavorable intermediate risk

ocman profile image
8 Replies

I thought I did my homework, but now I realize according to the NCCN guidelines, I could've chosen a different path.

I have Gleason 7 (4+3) unfavorable intermediate risk PCa and I chose the HDR Brachytherapy (monotherapy) path.

It looks like EBRT & HDR Brachytherapy is the SOC for unfavorable intermediate risk.

peace

Written by
ocman profile image
ocman
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
8 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

HDR brachy monotherapy has very good results, even in high risk cases, and may have lower risk of side effects:

prostatecancer.news/2016/08...

ocman profile image
ocman in reply to Tall_Allen

Since, I didn’t have a bone scan or a PSMA-PET prior to therapy, would you recommend getting a PSMA-PET scan now?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to ocman

You only get a test when there is a decision to be made. If you would do the same thing either way, you should not have a test.

CarverD profile image
CarverD

HDR-BT is quite successful as mono-therapy. Hope your's goes as well as mine did. I'm 6 months out and PSA continues to drop; now at .84 ng/ml. Side effects are minimal.

ocman profile image
ocman in reply to CarverD

Thanks, that's great that you're having minimal side effects.

curtisbirch profile image
curtisbirch

Unfavorable intermediate vs. intermediate can be defined different ways using many different gradings systems. Also some doctors will rule you that way to justify more treatment. I was on the fence as a 50 year old about doing dual treatments and am really glad I chose HDR brachy monotherapy for both its effectiveness and lack of side effects. Per Tall Allen and backed by HDR brachy pioneer Dr Dimanes’ 30+ years of research and treatment, there is plenty of argument for HDR montherapy. This was the doctor that convinced me.

judg69 profile image
judg69

Hi ocman, I had very intense Gleason 4+3, with 9 of 12 biopsy cores cancerous with 5 being 50% or more, and 2 being over 80%. Treated 2 years ago with full course IMRT radiation and 6 months ADT ( Firmagon ) . Still here at 70 and now take Flomax ( tamulosin ) to aid in urination. No regrets at all. All best wishes to you, judg69

ocman profile image
ocman in reply to judg69

Thanks brother, best to you too...

You may also like...

Low to intermediate risk

My boyfriend is recently diagnosed with intermediate risk PC which hopefully is confined to the...

Adding ADT to external beam radiation only benefits unfavorable risk patients

\\"Favorable intermediate risk\\" patients are sometimes overtreated by doctors who give them...

SBRT has excellent outcomes for intermediate risk patients

to work well on low risk patients, but the real benefit is for intermediate risk patients who are...

SBRT v. Brachytherapy for Favorable Intermediate Risk

with SBRT. I know TallAllen likes SBRT. Why is it superior to brachytherapy, other than less...

ADT or not for favourable intermediate risk with SBRT

advice, if I choose is SBRT but no ADT due to CVD risk as I have chads score 2, had 1 previous...