SBRT for high risk - results may be a... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,288 members3,352 posts

SBRT for high risk - results may be as good as brachy boost therapy, and toxicity may be lower

Tall_Allen profile image
4 Replies

A small (n=60) pilot trial in Canada of high-risk men treated with SBRT (or SABR) reported great results. Half the men had whole pelvic radiation (+ seminal vesicles), half had prostate and seminal vesicles only, with a higher SV dose. After 5 years, biochemical failure only occurred in 15% of the men who had SBRT to the prostate+SV-only, and was ZERO among the men who received whole pelvic radiation. Pretty impressive so far.

pcnrv.blogspot.com/2017/03/...

Written by
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
4 Replies
dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin

Thanks for this--very encouraging. The Alayed paper is behind a pay wall--do you know if the cohorts were randomly assigned?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply todentaltwin

They were actually from two different trials done consecutively. They had the same recruitment criteria.

dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin in reply toTall_Allen

Thanks--yes, small trial and not statistically powerful, but encouraging nonetheless. Particularly positive given the non-inferiority with pelvic radiation.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply todentaltwin

I worried about the toxicity of whole pelvic SBRT - but at least in those 30 men, it didn't seem to be an issue. It should only be done in clinical trials for now.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

SBRT for High Risk PC

Not quite as effective as Brachy Boost Therapy, but less toxic and more convenient....
Tall_Allen profile image

Should SBRT be THE preferred treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer?

Unfortunately, not enough patients meet with a radiation oncologist who specializes in SBRT. While...
Tall_Allen profile image

I'm new here, High Decipher Score still good for SBRT

Hi, appreciate all the info here. This is my initial post, I'm 64, biopsy in Feb. 2021 shows 5 of...
JDL_Coffee profile image

Decision Time

Hi All, I recently posted with my situation and have a follow-up (final I hope) with Dr. Gorovets...
MrGreenJeans profile image

Is whole pelvic radiation needed for primary treatment of Gleason 9/10?

When it is not obvious that there are cancerous pelvic lymph nodes, it may nonetheless improve...
Tall_Allen profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.