A small (n=60) pilot trial in Canada of high-risk men treated with SBRT (or SABR) reported great results. Half the men had whole pelvic radiation (+ seminal vesicles), half had prostate and seminal vesicles only, with a higher SV dose. After 5 years, biochemical failure only occurred in 15% of the men who had SBRT to the prostate+SV-only, and was ZERO among the men who received whole pelvic radiation. Pretty impressive so far.
SBRT for high risk - results may be a... - Prostate Cancer N...
SBRT for high risk - results may be as good as brachy boost therapy, and toxicity may be lower
Written by
Tall_Allen
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
4 Replies
•
Thanks for this--very encouraging. The Alayed paper is behind a pay wall--do you know if the cohorts were randomly assigned?
They were actually from two different trials done consecutively. They had the same recruitment criteria.
Thanks--yes, small trial and not statistically powerful, but encouraging nonetheless. Particularly positive given the non-inferiority with pelvic radiation.
Not what you're looking for?
You may also like...
SBRT for High Risk PC
Not quite as effective as Brachy Boost Therapy, but less toxic and more convenient....
Should SBRT be THE preferred treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer?
Unfortunately, not enough patients meet with a radiation oncologist who specializes in SBRT. While...
I'm new here, High Decipher Score still good for SBRT
Hi, appreciate all the info here. This is my initial post, I'm 64, biopsy in Feb. 2021 shows 5 of...
Decision Time
Hi All,
I recently posted with my situation and have a follow-up (final I hope) with Dr. Gorovets...
Is whole pelvic radiation needed for primary treatment of Gleason 9/10?
When it is not obvious that there are cancerous pelvic lymph nodes, it may nonetheless improve...