group B streptococcus (GBS) - Pregnancy and Par...

Pregnancy and Parenting Support

59,294 members17,004 posts

group B streptococcus (GBS)

6 Replies

Hi everyone. Hope you're all well. Someone mentioned this to my husband the other day so I've done a little reading and I'm torn. The NHS doesn't offer to test for GBS pre-birth - you have to do it privately. Instances of babies with GBS are rare but they do happen and then (even more rarely) sometimes newborns get really sick and even die.

But the numbers are miniscule:

One in every 2000 newborn babies in the UK and Ireland is diagnosed with GBS infection. Although the infection can make the baby very unwell, with prompt treatment the majority (7 out of 10 of diagnosed babies) recover fully. However, 2 in 10 babies with GBS infection will recover with some level of disability, and 1 in 10 infected babies will die. Overall, 1 in 17000 newborn babies in the UK and Ireland die from the infection.

The reasons that the current guidelines (legacy.screening.nhs.uk/gro... don't recommend routine testing for expectant mothers seem to make sense to me because at present, there is no clear evidence to show that testing for GBS routinely would do more good than harm:

•The current UK rate of early onset GBS is comparable to that in countries in which screening is recommended. A significant burden of disease is found in risk groups whose management would not be affected by a screening programme. The ability of screening to significantly impact on mortality and long term morbidity caused by GBS is uncertain.

• Many women carry the bacteria and, in the majority of cases, their babies are born safely and without developing an infection.

• Screening all women late in pregnancy cannot predict which babies will develop GBS infection.

• No screening test is entirely accurate. A negative swab test does not guarantee that you are not a carrier of GBS. In other words, you may be given a negative result when in fact you do carry GBS in your vagina.

• In addition, the majority of babies who are severely affected from GBS infection are born prematurely, before the suggested time for screening.

• Giving all carriers of GBS antibiotics would mean that a very large number of women at very low risk would receive treatment they do not need.

• There is also the general risk from overuse of antibiotics leading to strains of bacteria becoming resistant.

More info: nhs.uk/chq/pages/2037.aspx?...

handy leaflet to download: rcog.org.uk/globalassets/do...

So I guess my question is - has anyone got any experience of this? Has anyone been screened?

All opinions/experiences welcomed!

Thanks.

Read more about...
6 Replies
Steffi_27 profile image
Steffi_27

My first born had a group b infection and at 7 days old was hospitalised and given intravenous antibiotics, he made a full recovery. I've since had two children who have not been affected nor was I given antibiotics during labour.

Group b bacteria is incredibly common and present in most of us and generally harmless to adults. Testing procedures are extremely flawed due to the nature of the infection. The tests only reveals whether the bacteria/infection is active at the time of testing. Thus a negative result does not necessarily mean there is no active infection present at labour and vice versa which makes NHS testing a waste of scarce resources.

Having a private test is entirely your decision however it offers no guarantees. Personally I think the emphasis should be on wether or not the symptoms are present in the in the baby's first week.

in reply toSteffi_27

Thanks so much for responding.

SilkeP profile image
SilkeP

Neither of mine had it but I got tested for both of mine using this private test for about £40. I felt it was worth the money though not everyone agrees.

in reply toSilkeP

Thanks SilkeP, always good to hear both sides.

crystal2013 profile image
crystal2013

I had it but they only found out after I experienced some bleeding at 30 weeks and did an internal examination / swab. If they know then they can deal with it should there be a problem. I had a c-section so it wasn't going to be much of an issue. If you think of all the women who conceive and give birth whilst possibly having this bacteria and they give birth to healthy babies it seems unnecessary to provide the test, even though there will be some unfortunate situations I guess they only have so much funding.

in reply tocrystal2013

Thanks crystal2013 that's a really good point.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Thoughts on group B strep

Hi everyone I've had two previous pregnancies and both were normal throughout no complications etc....
Allyemo1985 profile image

15 weeks pregnant and blood screening shows im in high risk group

I am 15 weeks pregnant and was wandering if anyone has had a down syndrome screening and then had a...
indiebird profile image

Strep B Testing

Has anyone had the Strep B test? I understand it isn't offered as routine screening in the NHS but...
Chickpeas profile image

How much to feed my little man?

My little boy is 10 weeks old. He was born 9lb 1oz so he is a sturdy bundle :-) he is currently on...
smiler1985 profile image

Hi ladies - i have a hospital appt tomorrow with the midwife and i know she is going to discuss the whooping cough jab

I'm really undecided and swaying towards saying i don't want it. i've looked at the figures on the...
heegy profile image

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.