Hi everyone, I am new here, writing from the Netherlands. I have a question that I am struggling with:
After a 2 lungembolisms in 2013 and 2016 and many other symptoms I was (finally) diagnosed for Addison Biermer desease. Since then I have recovered quite strongly (95%). But as a consequence of the two cases of embolism I am prescribed for blood thinning medication for the rest of my life, which is "standard protocol" in the Netherlands.
However, research suggest that the lungembolisms likely were caused by the B12 deficiency. So I argued with my physician that now the root cause was found and eliminated (by regular B12 injections) the chance of further embolisms is likewise normalised. I suggested to stop with the blood thinning medication (Xarelto). My physician said there is no statistical correlation between embolisms and pernicious anemy and said I should stay on the blood thinning medication.
My question is twofold: Does anybody know whether this lack of statistical correlation is true (I found several places that does suggest a correlation), and I am very interested in any opinions on stopping with blood thinning medication in my situation.
To put it in another form of question: do people that have been diagnosed for PA, but did not have any embolisms in their clinical picture prescribed blood thinning medication or not at all?
Last remark: I realise that these are difficult questions (probably) and will not take any decisions lightly, but if safe enough I would like to stop with the blood thinning medication, because (a) I do not like to take unneccesary medication, (b) this medication requires a yearly check on the functioning of my kidneys (possible side effects of medication) and (c) my father died of at a young age of kidney failure so I may run serious risks there. I am afraid my physician wants to stick to protocol for safety/liability reasons...
Would love to hear any feedback on this.
Thanks in advance
André