Why didn't the low-fat advice end in 2... - Weight Loss Support

Weight Loss Support

115,044 members61,284 posts

Why didn't the low-fat advice end in 2011??

Subtle_badger profile image
1 Reply

I just read this on nutrition.org

"The National Diet and Nutrition Survey of adults shows that in 2008/09-2010/11, the average daily intake of fat was 78.8g and 60.1g for men and women respectively (providing around 35% and 34.4% of the food energy in the diet, i.e. excluding alcohol intake), having fallen from 40% of food energy intake in 1986/7. This indicates that fat now contributes a significantly lower proportion of energy in the UK diet than when the previous survey was carried out in 1986/87 and that on average men and women are meeting the recommended population target for dietary fat of 35% of food energy. The survey also showed that intake of saturated fatty acids (SFA, saturates) had fallen from 17% (in 1986/7) to 12.8% and 12.6% of food energy for men and women respectively, although this still exceeds the recommended 11%."

Which is astounding! Most of us met the fat goal and some (including me) must have been way under. And even though we didn't quite meet the saturated fat goal, nearly half of us must have been at 11% or below (again, including me). Has there ever been a more successful public health lifestyle intervention?

So what happened to our weight at during that period? In 1986 there was 7% of men obese, and 12% of women. By 2009, that had grown 24% and 26% respectively. Note: it's about 1/3 of the population now.

I really don't understand how they can continue to push this advice a decade later. It's baffling.

I did check what happened to cardiovascular disease during the same period: it dropped precipitously. Then I checked, smoking rates dropped 43% over the same period, which would explain the drop entirely.

Written by
Subtle_badger profile image
Subtle_badger
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
1 Reply
slipstick profile image
slipstickMaintainer2st 7lbs

Percentages are always interesting but did that article also include the changes in total calorie intake? I'd guess that the mad growth in those packaged "low fat" foods which replaced the fat with sugar and in many case increased the total energy had something to do with what went on.

If you really want to know what's going on you need to consider total energy and all the major nutrients not just one. Neither "low fat" or "high fat" on their own will solve anything.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Why low fat yogurt isn't good for you...

Nobody panic. It's not that low fat yoghurt is bad for you, it DOES contain some dietary proteins...

Getting the most from Low Carb (LCHF)

This is partly a response to the conversation between @[1271266] and @[407599] (which I was unable...
TheAwfulToad profile image
Visitor

question re low calorie high fat fasting diet

Could anyone give me details of a low cal high fat diet that is effective please. I have to ensure...
rosyG profile image

Christmas Calories

Something to bear in mind over the festive period. Those sweet and savoury treats that we may...
Pineapple27 profile image

almost at the end

I want to share this pic with evryone so you guys can see yourselves the positive effect on this...
teresina08 profile image

Moderation team

See all
BridgeGirl profile image
BridgeGirlAdministrator
TheTabbyCat profile image
TheTabbyCatAdministrator
TeamAdmin profile image
TeamAdminAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.