Hello folks
I’m a 34 year old female actually based in the UK but I figure this will tally across most countries. I currently being referred to neurologist for some worsening possible neurological symptoms and booked for a spine and head MRI to start ruling out MS and also any spinal compression (I have scoliosis and osteoporosis). My issue is that I was previously booked to have a 3T MRI scan but because of the metal rods in my back I’ve had to rebook onto a 1.5 but I’ve now read more and discovered that the 3T is particularly good for brain scans, more detailed, has more chance of picking up lesions, particularly in certain areas of the brain. I’m debating asking to split my MRIs and have spine done on 1.5 and then get the head on the 3T. Has anyone experienced something like this with where they’ve found the differences? Studies I’ve read are confusing as they seem to both suggest that lesions are more likely to be picked up but that it also does not improve the ability to diagnosis of MS. I don’t want to make things more complicated than necessary but I want to be sure. Unfortunately with the state the NHS is in at the moment even urgent referrals get a waiting list so it’s likely going to be a while before I can see a neurologist so this scan is going through my GP.
My symptoms including dizziness, vertigo, double vision, nausea/heaviness on standing, increased difficult walking when stop starting, muscle weakness in legs in particular (like back of legs are going to buckle), tremors, cold sensations in right leg, wet socks feeling, numbness in limbs, memory issues, concentration etc. I’ve suspected and wanted to rule out MS for years and finally talked to my GP about it who has referred me urgently so I assume she believe something is going on too, I already have an extensive medical history. I’ve been wanting this MRI for years so I really don’t want to mess this up.
TIA